The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: OT: acid test..
by Anonymous on Thursday 28/Apr/2005, @11:40
|
Thanks Zack for clearing this up. That makes me remember not to buy any Apple products now, or in the future.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: OT: acid test..
by Anonymous on Friday 06/May/2005, @06:11
|
Why? Because they forked the KHTML code?
What would you have them do, slow development of WebKit to suit the KHTML developers?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: OT: acid test..
by cm on Friday 06/May/2005, @07:21
|
> What would you have them do, slow development of WebKit to suit the KHTML developers?
No, to the contrary. Speed up the development of KHTML for both sides by combining development workforces and by maintaining a common system-independent version in a common public CVS. The system-dependent part (KWQ and whatever else they may have added) could have been maintained wherever Apple wanted it to reside.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
This is a little disturbing
by foobie on Thursday 28/Apr/2005, @13:07
|
Seems like we just talked about this a little while ago (
http://dot.kde.org/1097096753/1097113373/ ).
I know that Apple is complying with the letter of the law on this one... but perhaps we can bring some attention to this and maybe it will make apple play fair.
One thing we can do is make some noise, it's probably too late now though (too much forking???).
I'll try to <A href="http://panela.blog-city.com">blog</A> about this tonight.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|