Re: Licensing

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Licensing
by stumbles on Thursday 28/Apr/2005, @15:21

Let's see. Wibble on over to the link. Opps don't have an account. Let's see, register. Hmmm, they want email, name and address and to top it off they want my birthday? Now I realize I could put in false information but that is not my nature.

Disappointing it is Apples version would be chosen over howl. Instead of working with the howl developers to over come some "deficiencies".

Related Links

·   Articles on Interviews
·   Also by stumbles
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Licensing
by Jakub Stachowski on Friday 29/Apr/2005, @00:39

At first, KDE's Zeroconf code was based on Howl but got rewritten. Howl internally uses forked old version of Apple's code, so 'overcoming deficiencies' would be just recreating work that is already done in mDNSResponder. What for? If you have problem with registration then fine, download from mirror (check Gentoo ebuild for addresses).

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Licensing
by stumbles on Friday 29/Apr/2005, @04:23

Well thanks for the info, I did not know that about howl.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"My keyboard and synthesizers have a nice pile of dust on top of their covers." -- Carsten Pfeiffer
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.