Re: Krita still sucks...

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Krita still sucks...
by ExKritaUser on Saturday 29/Mar/2008, @09:45

Unfortunately, he/she is correct. Another example of the kind of software that is a road paved with good intentions... and never hath hell so much fury. Grossly over complicates the simplest things.

Ex. an eraser is a concept I thought I was familiar with. Used 'em like crazy, no doubt (i.e. yes, I make plenty of mistakes--BUT I ERASE THEM!). But thanks to krita, it's like meeting the eraser all over again. Click on it, touch your picture, and presto!, the whole thing turns purple. Huh?

This is why Microsoft, bad as it is, still makes sense to 80% of the world's computing population. And they PAY for it.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Office Suite
·   Also by ExKritaUser
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Krita still sucks...
by Boudewijn Rempt on Saturday 29/Mar/2008, @16:31

Er...

I think you accidentally clicked, two or three years after the posting you replied to, on the "selection eraser" tool. Which erases bits of the current selection. If you want to erase bit of your painting, choose the eraser from the combobox in the topmost toolbar. (And yes, that's similar to the way a famous Windows application works.)

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Time for a make-it-cool branch?" -- Simon Hausmann
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.