faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
|
Re: #4
by James Richard Tyrer on Thursday 30/Jun/2005, @11:40
|
Some of this should be simple since most of the Konqueror (note that Konqueror is not a web browser) UI already has an XML interface that controls about 90% of the interface. I hope that someone is working on the other 10% :-)
However, the Firefox XUL user interface is not all good. Firefox does not support the FreeDesktop standard for icons (which KDE uses). I point out to P.S. that as a KDE app that Konqueror with a XUL based UI will need to continue to support the KDE/FD icon system rather than having the icons in JARs like Firefox.
So, he will have to solve the icon issue. When he does, this could also be ported to Firefox. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: #4
by Morty on Thursday 30/Jun/2005, @16:11
|
I don't think it's aimed at making it possible having XUL based UI for Konqueror, it sounds like it geared towards making Konqueror accept XUL based objects. Like plugins and such. Not making the UI of Konqueror in XUL, but making it possible to run XUL plugins, like the ones made for Firefox, native in Konqueror.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: #4
by Illissius on Friday 01/Jul/2005, @10:17
|
As far as I know - and that's only peripherally - Firefox's XUL plugins are only possible /because/ the entire UI is written in XUL. So one follows from the other.
Rather, I think the goal is XUL in webpages, but I'm not the one doing it so obviously can't say with certainty =).
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|