faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: SkinStyle
by Iuri Fiedoruk on Thursday 11/Aug/2005, @15:06
|
Well... I dontt like it, I think programs could have a "kool" interface while still using KDE/Qt as base (take a look at k3b to see what I mean).
But.. for some users and companies.. I'm sure this is kind of a good thing, so yes... (arght, my soul is in pain)... yes... it is a good idea to support skinds. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: SkinStyle
by tanguy_k on Friday 12/Aug/2005, @05:16
|
> I don't like it
Don't you think it can be good for multimedia players like noatun for instance?
You don't even have to change 1 single line of code: you just select the right QStyle plugin, you create a .ini file and .png files et voila.
You can re-organize entirely your layouts, change widgets position and size, map all widgets with .png files just by editing a .ini file.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: SkinStyle
by Iuri Fiedoruk on Friday 12/Aug/2005, @05:58
|
As I said before, I don't like it, BUT, I think it's a great idea.
So, now you're probally think: what the hell is he saying, this guy is nuts! Well... I don't like this kind of bloated interface, I prefer more simple, take amarok and k3b as an example, interface that dosen't scape very much from the overall look of programs, but that is for my taste! And I know most people like those bloated interface, and it would be very good for us to keep people satisfacted... so, I vote for this even that I don't want to use it ;)
Kind of, well, I know 3 or 4 people that would love it, so go ahead and make them happy as I am already happy.
Sorry if I was confuse.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|