faq  flatforty  contribute  subscribe  configure  search  rdf  main  parent	BK? by john on Sunday 11/Sep/2005, @09:07 Thought BK sttod for bit keeper for a sec - wondered why KDE developers wanted to open that can of worms again :)	Related Links  ·   Articles on Developer  ·   Also by john  ·   Contact author Thread Threshold: 10 comments 20 comments 30 comments 40 comments 50 comments 60 comments 70 comments 80 comments 90 comments 100 comments 110 comments 120 comments 130 comments 140 comments 150 comments 160 comments 170 comments 180 comments 190 comments 200 comments 300 comments 400 comments 500 comments 1000 comments
	The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. ( Reply ) Re: BK? by chouimat on Tuesday 13/Sep/2005, @06:20 can of worm?? BK is/was one of the best available vcs, too bad zealots complained about the license ... [ Reply To This | View ] The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them. ( Reply )

		"I learnt programming in a very lovely language named GFA Basic." -- Michael Brade
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.

[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]