porting now

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent

porting now
by Ian Monroe on Sunday 11/Sep/2005, @19:17

Would it make any sense to move amaroK 1.4 to bksys? Could we do so and keep autoconf? Sounds like most of the TODO list for bksys is configuration related.

Of course, I can't imagine amaroK is that much more complicated then kdegames if at all. Its just that there are several features that have to be enabled/disabled.

(BTW, codeine is another KDE project using scons).

Related Links

·   Articles on Developer
·   Also by Ian Monroe
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: porting now
by Guillaume Laurent on Monday 12/Sep/2005, @00:26

There is support for enabling/disabling features in bksys, we use it in Rosegarden. It can be improved, but it's perfectly useable as it is. As for using autoconf in parallel, yes, no problem, both are independant, but there's little reason to do so.

[ Reply To This | View ]

porting happening
by Ian Monroe on Tuesday 13/Sep/2005, @21:02

Just for people keeping score, Max Howell has begun writing the SConscript's for amaroK.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I didn't know there was a superlative of 'Warmduscher'." -- Carsten Pfeiffer
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.