[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main


  Open Letter to Alan Yates of Microsoft
KDE Office Suite Posted by Inge Wallin on Friday 23/Sep/2005, @15:47
from the umpire-strikes-back dept.
In his reply to the Massachusetts decision to use only documents in OpenDocument format, the Microsoft manager Alan Yates writes: (paraphrased) Star Office, Open Office, KOffice and IBM Workplace are all derivatives of the same codebase. Thus there is only one program that supports Open Document, and that is illegal. This is, of course, not true, and here is an open letter written by KOffice Marketing Coordinator Inge Wallin on behalf of the KOffice team which clarifies these facts.

Open Letter to

Alan Yates
General Manager
Microsoft Corporation

Dear Mr Yates,

It is with great interest that I have followed the debate that started with the Massachusetts decision to only exchange data with other parties in an open format, namely Open Document. I must say that personally I find the reasoning behind the decision to be sound, but I fully support your right to disagree with this sentiment.

In your rather long, and doubtlessly well researched, reply to the declaration, you make many points which I will not address here, since others, better suited than me, have already done so. There is, however, one point where I feel that you have been gravely misinformed by your research staff.

That point is the following. On page 7, and continuing on page 8 you write:

The draft policy identifies four products that support the OpenDocument format: Sun's StarOffice, OpenOffice.org, KOffice, and IBM Workplace. In reality, these products are slight variations of the same StarOffice code base, which Sun acquired from a German company in 1999. The different names are little more than unique brands applied by the vendors to the various flavors of the code base that they have developed. In essence, a commitment to the OpenDocument format is a commitment to a single product or technology. This approach to product selection by policy violates well-accepted public procurement norms.

I understand your worries, but fortunately I am able to put your mind to rest: KOffice is in fact not related to StarOffice or OpenOffice. It is a completely separate product, and a very fine one at that. One of our team members, David Faure, was an active party in the creation of the OASIS OpenDocument standard, and KOffice was the first office suite that publicly announced support for it.

Just to add a bit to your knowledge of KOffice, I would like to mention a few points:

  • KOffice is the most comprehensive of all office suites in existence, comprising no less than 11 different components in one well-integrated package.
  • These components include core office applications like KWord, KSpread and KPresenter, but also creativity applications like Krita (an advanced pixel based drawing tool), Kivio (flowcharts), Karbon (vector based drawing) and Kexi, an integrated environment for database applications not unlike to your own Access.
  • KOffice is very well integrated into KDE, the multiple award winning desktop environment on Linux, Solaris and other UNIX variants.
  • KOffice is fully network-transparent and all components can send documents as mail, print to PDF files and store and load documents from countless different network servers.
  • Last, but not least: Within a year, KOffice will likely run on Windows as well.

In case you think that even two competing products will not be enough to satisfy the "well-accepted public procurement norms", I can assure you that they will soon not be alone. The fine word processor AbiWord and the spreadsheet program Gnumeric, will also soon support Open Document due to an independent effort by a Nokia research lab.

I am sure that you are now much calmer, and if you want to know more, you can always go to the KOffice website. You can also write to the KOffice mailing list and ask your questions there.

Respectfully,

Inge Wallin
Marketing Coordinator
On behalf of the KOffice Team



<  |  >

 

  Related Links
 ·   Articles on KDE Office Suite
 ·   Also by Inge Wallin
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Over 40 comments listed. Printing out index only.
Thank you, Inge. I'm sure this will help.
by manyoso on Saturday 24/Sep/2005, @06:12
I am sure that Mr. Yates will be greatly reassured and uplifted by your letter. Hopefully, this will assuage the horrible anxiety Microsoft has suffered and continues to suffer, in the wake of this OpenDocument announcement, for it's good friend... the honorable State of Massachusetts.
[ Reply To This | View ]
It's Final - MA Goes With Open Document
by Haakon Nilsen on Saturday 24/Sep/2005, @06:39
As you may have heard, Massachusetts yesterday made its final decision to standardize on the OpenDocument format for all productivity applications. Check out http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050923142231938 for some comments.
[ Reply To This | View ]
Reply to Mr Yates
by Gerry on Saturday 24/Sep/2005, @07:39
The approach you rebut here seems rather tired - haven't we all been here before? (e.g., http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/05/19/ms_in_peruvian_opensource_nightmare/).

Does anyone who isn't a fanboy react any differently to the way journalists did here? http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/08/16/msoft_newham_10yr_deal/

Indeed, the penny is beginning to drop in ordinary society http://technology.guardian.co.uk/online/insideit/story/0,13270,1550922,00.html
[ Reply To This | View ]
Opendocument
by gerd on Saturday 24/Sep/2005, @08:52
The intresting issue is: What will it take to convince Microsoft to support Opendocument?

If we attack on all levels and fora in lobbying it must be possible to convince politicians of Opendocument.

But: do we have an advocacy paper?
[ Reply To This | View ]
German blog post
by AC on Saturday 24/Sep/2005, @09:00
http://www.netzpolitik.org/2005/microsoft-ubt-kritik-an-opendocument/
[ Reply To This | View ]
Letter to Massachusetts
by Ivor Hewitt on Saturday 24/Sep/2005, @09:07
Perhaps there should also be a letter to the fine people of Massachusetts congratulating them on their decision and letting them know all about KWord and letting them know of its Open Document support... perhaps someone over there could present them with a box full of Kubunty CD's ?
[ Reply To This | View ]
Textmak import OpenDocument also
by Anony Maus on Saturday 24/Sep/2005, @09:13
The newest version of Textmake from Softmaker http://www.softmaker.de at least can import OpenDocument format and as far as I know they will fully support it in future versions.
[ Reply To This | View ]
It's a political issue...
by Lochball on Saturday 24/Sep/2005, @09:32
This seems to be a political issue initiated from the Commonwealth of Masssachusetts probably to gain more freedom of selecting more than one software product for the future for governmental work and obligations. The right and only way in my opinion...
[ Reply To This | View ]
MS will just support OpenDocument =)
by Zero on Saturday 24/Sep/2005, @09:48
That's an easy task for them. Just one month worth of work. They'll feature discriminate; when selling to Mass, they offer that to them, when selling to everyone else, it would just be Office 12 format only. Unless all of US and Europe decide to mandate this. Then, hehee, Microsoft will be forced to support OpenDocument as a default standard. =)

Another tactic Microsoft would take is to attack the inferiority of OpenDocument, that it didn't include advanced features in today's office productivity. This may be their only strong point.
[ Reply To This | View ]
heh
by me on Saturday 24/Sep/2005, @10:56
Marketing koffice to MS.. I hope his response will also be posted here (if any)
[ Reply To This | View ]
The terrible injustice
by Daniel on Saturday 24/Sep/2005, @11:44
I am also concerned by the fact that OpenDocument's only representative on Windows is OpenOffice. Together with microsoft, I find it terribly unjust that we are sort of forced to use the only one available fully-featured application for creation of the OpenDocument documents.
I hope Microsoft will correct this terrible injustice by implementing OpenDocument support into its Office line.
[ Reply To This | View ]
Remember this?
by George Staikos on Saturday 24/Sep/2005, @12:43
http://dot.kde.org/1069632528/
[ Reply To This | View ]
Moving to Windows??
by Vlad Grigorescu on Saturday 24/Sep/2005, @15:15
First off, excellent letter. Secondly, sorry if I'm a little behind the times here, but KOffice is moving to Windows? Does this mean that it will lose most of it's KDE functions (DCOP, for instance) and be ported? What about QT?
[ Reply To This | View ]
What Ms is working on
by gerd on Saturday 24/Sep/2005, @16:26
some nice developer's insights of microsoft:

Outlook Express to be renamed windows Mail, finally adds spam filter / Video
http://channel9.msdn.com/showpost.aspx?postid=116711

sharepoint
http://www.sharepointblogs.com/dustin/archive/2005/09/14/3503.aspx

Screenshots of Office 12
http://pdc.xbetas.com/?page=o12preview1
[ Reply To This | View ]
Wikipedia
by jmfayard on Sunday 25/Sep/2005, @05:22
Great news.

OpenDocument is a major opportunity for KDE. If you have some time available, consider writing a bit about it on Wikipedia in your mother language. We actually have :
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument (very complete)
* http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument (complete, my humble contribution)
* http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument (not too bad, but need some updates)
* http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument
* http://th.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument
* Nothing in other languages
[ Reply To This | View ]
To make a point
by Chris on Sunday 25/Sep/2005, @11:14
Just some clarification for the first poster.
Quote: "the honorable State of Massachusetts."

Massachusetts is actually a Commonwealth.
-C
[ Reply To This | View ]
koffice maybe ...
by scot on Sunday 25/Sep/2005, @11:30
in practice there are not many if any OpenDocument applications that are out of beta that run natively on OSX or Windows.

OpenOffice will be out soon-ish, but koffice still wont run natively on windows or MacOS. (where MS office does now).

Alan might have a fleeting point as of right now.
[ Reply To This | View ]
Codebase? Who Cares?
by Todd on Sunday 25/Sep/2005, @14:22
Besides, what does having the same codebase have to do with it? The worry is having the same company or organization control all the programs able to use Open Document. If Star Office, Open Office, KOffice and IBM Workplace were all owned by one company, that would be something to worry about. And even then, the Open Document format is still open. Someone could still make a new program to read and write it.
[ Reply To This | View ]
Crap!
by Gogo on Sunday 25/Sep/2005, @22:20
This is all crap... Koffice is the most what? Me cago de la risa! Come on! be serious!
[ Reply To This | View ]
Forget M$
by some guy on Monday 26/Sep/2005, @20:53
I thought the letter was just fine. I especially liked the line: koffice will likely run on windows as well. Kind of like "we're coming in your yard too, Billy boy!"
Honestly, I've been operating free of Microshaft software for years now; the only reason I ever use it is out of necessity- compatibility issues with a law office that uses Word Imperfect, which no longer runs on Linux.
Let's face it: Microsoft and the open source community are exact opposites anymore. Open source developers generally have one interest in mind: getting the product to a usable state and getting it out where folks can use it. Microsoft has slightly more complicated motives: making a lot of money, selling advertising space on bundled PCs (you should have seen the load of ads that popped up the first time I booted this machine, before I FORMATTED the hard drive!) and policing and controlling at every turn how "their" software is sold, bought, used and even disposed of. And if you don't do it right, watch out. If this were a less free society, each person even accused of pirating Microsoft software might be thrown in the Lubyanka or something. Honestly, I get sick of hearing the views of big corporate bullies on the state of open source.
One thing that I can actually imagine Microsoft developers having pioneered would be the rigid piracy countermeasures embedded in the software. Heaven forbid that intellectual property should be shared as freely as speech, of which it is only really another form.
(If anyone reading this works at any of the above mentioned establishments, equal commiserations in any case.)
[ Reply To This | View ]
M$ panicking just for OpenDocument, image KDE 4
by NS on Monday 26/Sep/2005, @22:28
M$ is panicking and worried about OpenDocument, just image the release of KDE4 (before MS Vista) with KOffice that runs in Windows as well. Then averages users will wonder why in fews months why they are still using Windows with KDE4, instead of Linux.
[ Reply To This | View ]
Why not XML?
by Norman on Monday 26/Sep/2005, @23:01
I just browsed through Yates' letter and it seemed Massachusetts had difficulties to decide between OpenDocument and XML format. Does anybody know what where the key arguments to turn down XML?

Norm
[ Reply To This | View ]
Yes, you're right
by 9 Rich Guy on Saturday 21/Jan/2006, @15:56
every body nows that Microsoft isn't right. you are right not him. he is crazy,
stupid etc.:))
[ Reply To This | View ]
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "The trick is not to dream of adding a feature, but simply to do it." -- Stefan Westerfeld
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]