faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
|
The 1.0 release..
by bsander on Wednesday 09/Nov/2005, @22:29
|
| Will I be able to sync korganizer with my WinCE phone with the 1.0 release, or do I have to wait for KDE4 until that is implemented? I really prefer Kontact/Korganizer over Evolution, but for now I'm stuck with the latter due to the syncing support.. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: The 1.0 release..
by zecke on Thursday 10/Nov/2005, @04:34
|
We plan to release a GUI for KDE 3.5 slightly after KDE 3.5 gets released. You definately don't have to wait for KDE4.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: The 1.0 release..
by bsander on Thursday 10/Nov/2005, @05:55
|
Yes, but I was talking about this:
"The first official stable 1.0 release of OpenSync is planned for the beginning of 2006. The KDE based frontend will be released in parallel to OpenSync 1.0. This release will contain support for syncing Palm Pilots, SyncML, Evolution, Kontact, files and IrMC capable devices like mobile phones."
Which doesn't mention WinCE (though earlier in the article it was mentioned). So I was wondering if the WinCE plugin is going to be available with that release or with a later release, and if so, when?
Thanks :)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: The 1.0 release..
by Giacomo on Thursday 10/Nov/2005, @23:20
|
As far as I know, MultiSync (the codebase on which OpenSync is based) already supports WinCE (via the SynCE library). So when OpenSync comes out, it will most certainly support WinCE. Given that the KDE part will only be a frontend, then it should be able to seamlessly support WinCE as well.
This is an excellent decision. Supporting all these devices is difficult and duplicated efforts are a waste of already-thin resources. The status of KDE tools for WinCE devices has always been sub-par, and this could finally solve the situation. Great move!
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|