faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
|
konqueor...
by Ilovekonqueror on Tuesday 22/Nov/2005, @00:38
|
| Konqueror browser web and konqueror browser file should be separated. Althought konqueror browser file can use khtml. This is the best. Less dificult, more open velocity, ... |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: konqueor...
by Shift on Tuesday 22/Nov/2005, @06:27
|
I totally agree with you. Konqueror is bloated because of its "file manager" aspect.
Make an external browser using khtml and focus on it to improve add-ons development, plugins,... and let Konqueror use kpart to see html (like now).
Please !!!
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: konqueor...
by Joe on Tuesday 22/Nov/2005, @06:34
|
If you guys actually knew anything, you would be dangerous.
When you become real-life coders and know what you are talking about...well, that's never going to happen, so let's all have a laugh.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: konqueor...
by T Middleton on Tuesday 22/Nov/2005, @13:29
|
While technically Joe's outburst is more learnèd than those he was responding to, the fact that there is a *perception* to the contrary is enough to perhaps to consider...
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: konqueor...
by Keep them on Tuesday 22/Nov/2005, @22:42
|
Of course I know what I am talking about. My name is on one of the Konqueror add-on changelog files. Rellinks is a small add-on but it was sufficient for me to stop working on Konqueror add-ons.
And what I can say is that a Konqueror add-on developer need to deal with the "file manager" aspect of Konqueror.
And I am not a GNOME troll. I use KDE since KDE 1.0. To love something doesn't mean that you mustn't critisice it :)
Konqueror can open PDF, but kpdf is the PDF application.
Konqueror can open images but kview it the image application.
I only want KDE to be able to open web-pages (like now) but I prefer an external KDE browser focused on web and flexibility for plugins, addons,... See how much addons Konqueror has and how much firefox has. I hope that one day it will be possible to program addon for Konqueror with kjsembed.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: konqueor...
by Shift on Wednesday 23/Nov/2005, @02:07
|
I don't why my name was changed to "Keep them" but the previous message was mine.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: konqueor...
by arthur on Wednesday 23/Nov/2005, @09:36
|
yes!!!!!
Less profiles konqueror and more two aplication :o)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: konqueor...
by Aaron J. Seigo on Wednesday 23/Nov/2005, @15:11
|
what rellinks really needs is a means to say "i'm for this type of data or this type of URL/browsing only" and thereby have a way to filter what plugins are chosen / selected by default.
splitting konqueror into two pieces along the lines of "file" vs "web" won't actually solve this. it will address certain specific cases (e.g. rellinks, actually) but leave the problem for many other plugins.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: konqueor...
by Ilovekonqueror on Tuesday 22/Nov/2005, @23:42
|
Im a developer too. Linux Philosophy is a program for each necesity and this programa do it work very good.
Im sorry my English.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: konqueor...
by Luciano on Wednesday 23/Nov/2005, @09:18
|
Unix philosophy is to have small tools that do one thing well, and that can be work together to do new things as well.
Think using ls | more in a shell.
Konqueror is just another kind of shell, and the KParts and KioSlaves are the equivalent to the shell commands. I actually see little point in KPDF as a program, actually - what can you do with it that you can't with its KPart embedded in Konqueror?
You can actually combine the same commands in a different way, too.
On the other hand, Akregator uses the khtml part to give a different functionality, and I'm increasingly relying on it to browse the net, to the point that I'd like it to grow some more "regular" browser functionality (the Location bar, for example).
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: konqueor...
by Ilovekonqueror on Wednesday 23/Nov/2005, @09:30
|
You are guest, but...here we are speaking split konqueror.
Why kpdf if konqueror display pdf with kpart of kpdf?. Because is good.
The same is browser and konqueror. why dont have a browser out of konqueror as kpdf or other aplications?.
again Im sorry my English.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: konqueor...
by k on Tuesday 22/Nov/2005, @20:33
|
Are you Gnome trolls perhaps?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|
![[KDE Dot News]](http://www.kde.org/dot/Images/kdedotnews.gif)
