how about qcanvas?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent

how about qcanvas?
by Patcito on Tuesday 20/Dec/2005, @07:19

I thought it was going to be released with 4.1 :( I suppose it'll come out with 4.2 right guys?, :)

Related Links

·   Articles on Qt
·   Also by Patcito
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: how about qcanvas?
by Shyru on Tuesday 20/Dec/2005, @07:42

QCanvas ported to Qt4-Style API will be available as a QtSolution.
QCanvas as in Qt3 is in Qt3Support and is somewhat buggy and slow.
Something new and equivalent to QCanvas will be available in Qt 4.2

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: how about qcanvas?
by Patcito on Tuesday 20/Dec/2005, @07:54

>>QCanvas ported to Qt4-Style API will be available as a QtSolution

will it be open source?

>>Something new and equivalent to QCanvas will be available in Qt 4.2

sounds cool :)

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: how about qcanvas?
by Ian Monroe on Tuesday 20/Dec/2005, @08:14

http://doc.trolltech.com/4.1/porting4.html#qcanvas wasn't updated. :P

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: how about qcanvas?
by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday 20/Dec/2005, @08:43

From the release to commercial customers

*********************
QtCanvas Now Available
----------------------
The Qt 3 Canvas class has been ported to Qt 4.x, and does not depend
on any Qt3Support classes. The renamed QtCanvas is ideally suited for
customers who wish to port their QCanvas-based applications from Qt 3
to Qt 4 without relying on Qt3Support. QtCanvas is now available to
all Qt Desktop license holders.
*********************

I wonder if they'll opensource that one

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: how about qcanvas?
by Ian Monroe on Tuesday 20/Dec/2005, @10:58

It is open source already then. But its confusing: http://doc.trolltech.com/4.1/qtcanvas.html appears to have it named Q3Canvas.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: how about qcanvas?
by M_abs on Thursday 22/Dec/2005, @06:11

What Trolltech mean by "commercial" is that it is for paying customors only, eg. not open source.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Would you believe that this little program actually annoys some people?" -- Martin Jones
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.