The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: yet another layer ?
by Tobias König on Thursday 05/Jan/2006, @02:08
|
"KDE can run on *ANY* Unix..."
Right, but not any Unix provides HAL or D-Bus, for this reason we need yet another abstraction layer.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: yet another layer ?
by Ian Monroe on Friday 06/Jan/2006, @10:33
|
Right I'm saying the definition of "operating systems" now encompasses the functions of a DE. It isn't a stretch to say that providing to developers easy access to multimedia, hardware, and an HTML viewer are functions of an operating system. I'm not saying that this somehow means that DE's need to be unportable and stuck on a kernel.
I mean, if you look at the functionality KDE provides they are often because on the other platforms Qt resides they are already provided by the OS.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: yet another layer ?
by FreddyTheTeddy on Monday 09/Jan/2006, @02:41
|
In a Java VM, you get the core interpreter, which basically knows about the byte code and the underlying OS. But no Java Runtime or SDK comes without a huge set of libraries (handling IO, ZIP files, GUI stuff), but Java would be long dead if it did not come with them. They are bundled with the JDK, but not part of the core system, and yet Java specific. some of them have OS-dependent back-ends too.
Solid will be that set of libs shipping with for a given OS, for KDE apps. And who knows, future may lead to have Gnome and KDE sync up on this topic too :-)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|