faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: Companies and Technical Working Group
by yawn on Friday 13/Jan/2006, @18:51
|
You said...
No more than 2 members of the TWG can be working for the same company. The more KDE commercial success grows, the more companies working with KDE will want to control it.
Maybe I don't get it, but if some company seeks to control KDE by hiring good developers to hack on KDE color me unconcerned. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Companies and Technical Working Group
by superstoned on Saturday 14/Jan/2006, @02:37
|
na, it wouldn't be good. look at gnome, they had (and have) some problems with this. if red hat wants something, but novell wants the other direction, what do you get? decisions aren't made on technical merit alone, but on buzzwords and marketing value. that's bad, as one of the strengths of kde is the fact it generally makes TECHNICAL sound decisions, without 'political/corporate' influence.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Companies and Technical Working Group
by Reply on Sunday 15/Jan/2006, @07:08
|
I can't remember when Red Hat wanted something, Novell wanted something else, and GNOME went with the less technically sound decision. Could you please provide any examples?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Companies and Technical Working Group
by ac on Sunday 15/Jan/2006, @17:15
|
Well, if you followed the gnome archieves, you couldn't have missed it :o)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Companies and Technical Working Group
by Reply on Monday 16/Jan/2006, @11:28
|
Ah... the good old "i'm making stuff up".
ok then. ;)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|