The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
nicely done =)
by Aaron J. Seigo on Wednesday 01/Mar/2006, @19:37
|
just got finished... t. and the p-man and i sat around and listened in. family around the radio, so 1930. except now the radio is a laptop and the airwaves are tcp/ip networks ;)
zack did an awesome job. very entertaining (lots of laughs) and lots of great points about X.org, open source, the open source desktop, kde and more ... props to da man, and thanks for taking the time out of your schedule to do the show! =)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: nicely done =)
by Janne on Wednesday 01/Mar/2006, @23:28
|
t likes to listen to discussion about latest developements in X and KDE? Where do you find gals like that :)?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: nicely done =)
by superstoned on Thursday 02/Mar/2006, @08:28
|
well, i was even more amazed about the fact the "P-man" buyed into it... :D
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: nicely done =)
by Troels Just on Thursday 02/Mar/2006, @01:41
|
Oh man I was on the floor at times dang that show has it's moments! :P
And by the way Aaron, it was nice of you to hop onto the IRC channel! ;)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: nicely done =)
by lippel on Thursday 02/Mar/2006, @07:32
|
The p-man is interested in x.org/exa/xgl/xegl/KDE development? When will his first patches come in? ;-)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
got a working download link
by peter vdm on Wednesday 01/Mar/2006, @20:13
|
^^ can't find a link to the show that works, anyone got one?
cheers Peter
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: got a working download link
by cb400f on Thursday 02/Mar/2006, @04:30
|
http://tllts.info/archives/tllts_125-03-01-06.ogg
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
cutting to the chase
by Robert Guthrie on Wednesday 01/Mar/2006, @23:13
|
ok..
zack starts at 27:30 or so.
(believe me.. you will not miss anything)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Listening to it...
by Hans-Christian Andersen on Thursday 02/Mar/2006, @04:30
|
Listening to the podcast and am nearing the end, but its been really good. Zack has been a really good and interesting interviewee. Nice one :) Very informative.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
wow
by ac on Thursday 02/Mar/2006, @14:17
|
It seems that Zack has a *lot* of exiting stuff on his harddrive, I hope we're
gonna see some of it soon!
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: wow
by ac as well on Saturday 04/Mar/2006, @09:14
|
I agree, why keep it closed? He should release it somewhere!
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
Flash on PPC
by Ryan on Thursday 02/Mar/2006, @14:57
|
He wrote his own power pc Flash implementation?
Neato!
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Indirect VS direct rendering
by blacksheep on Friday 03/Mar/2006, @02:17
|
I'm far from being an expert on the subject, but it looks like to me that certain accessibility graphical effects would be only possible, or at least more elegantly implemented, on direct render, like a desktop magnifying glass. Is that so?
Also, doesn't direct rendered use the GPU better?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Indirect VS direct rendering
by Corbin on Friday 03/Mar/2006, @10:36
|
If you use direct rendering (right now at least), compositing effects and a desktop magnifying glass wouldn't work because everything is being rendered directly on the graphics card.
Both Direct Rendering and Indirect Rendering can use the GPU, and the main difference would be that indirect rendering goes through the X server instead of directly to the graphics card.
Stuff like a magnifying glass would be a whole lot easier with indirect rendering (to do it with direct rendering you would need to rewrite the drivers).
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
Inte 945G; GMA950
by James Richard Tyrer on Sunday 05/Mar/2006, @15:24
|
Not exactly sure what Zach was talking about.
Did he mean to say that graphs cards based on Intel chips are going to be available?
Did he mean to say that Keith Packard had written a (3D) driver for the Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 (which is what is in the 82945G north bridge chip?
A 'Yes' to both of these would make great improvements in the Linux graphics card problem!
Note to Intel: you could probably offer a 945 series graphics chip using 945 dice that you are now throwing away (ones with a broken Pentium bus) in a smaller package.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
|
Glucose?
by Corbin on Wednesday 08/Mar/2006, @19:36
|
Does anyone know anyting more about Glucose than its going to be a new acceleration architecture for Xorg, and its meant to not require any driver changes? This is the first I've heard anything about Glucose, and trying to google for information on it failed miserably.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Glucose?
by Parker Coates on Tuesday 15/Aug/2006, @18:58
|
It's hardly surprising that very little information is available: news of it just became public just twelve hours ago. Your best source of information should be http://zrusin.blogspot.com/2006/08/glucose-and-graphics.html .
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
![[KDE Dot News]](http://www.kde.org/dot/Images/kdedotnews.gif)
Posted by Jonathan Riddell on Wednesday 01/Mar/2006, @16:03