[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main


  KDE to Become Better Supported on the Ubuntu Platform
KDE in Linux Distributions Posted by Sebastian Kügler on Monday 08/May/2006, @07:16
from the towards-humanity dept.
At LinuxTag on Saturday, a meeting of Kubuntu and KDE contributors was held in order to improve the collaboration of both projects. The aim was to to talk about the common future of both projects. Jonathan Riddell and Mark Shuttleworth from Canonical attended the meeting. Later in his keynote speech to the conference, Mark publicly committed to Kubuntu as an essential product for Canonical and showed his commitment by wearing a KDE t-shirt.

Mark Shuttleworth during his keynote at Linuxtag 2006.

Introductions

At the beginning of the meeting, Mark outlined Canonical's vision of the future of Ubuntu Linux and the role of Kubuntu and KDE therein. Canonical wants to create a free, professional economic eco-system and help to develop and transport KDE's vision of the future of the free desktop. Starting with Dapper Drake, the next release of Kubuntu to be released at the beginning of June, Canonical will ship CD sets of Kubuntu in the same manner as it did with Ubuntu in the past. Artwork of the CD sets was shown to the attendants of the meeting.

Eva Brucherseifer held a short introduction to KDE, explaining different aspects of how the community works together, challenges in the community life cycle such as finding enough new developers and improving the sustainability of KDE as a Free Software project. She also explains that KDE is working actively on extending the KDE community further to non-developers. Eva described the decision making process within KDE as being very much bazaar-like; people exchanging ideas, seeking mindshare and creating it.

The Future of Kubuntu

Mark said that Canonical has created some tools to make Free Software developer communities more scalable such as Rosetta and Malone. It is also important to help newcomers to get into the project. Ubuntu's vision includes offering multiple desktops because it is a healthy way for a sustainable future that those desktop environments should work great together. Tighter integration of Canonical's collaboration tools with e.g. KDE's bugzilla is another keypoint of the collaboration in the future.

Mark went on acknowledging that native office programs - such as KOffice - are the preferred way to go, but that the process of adopting those is not easy because of exchange of for example files with the Windows platform and because they do not work on Windows as OpenOffice.org does. Canonical is committed to making sure to connect the source code vision of a project such as KDE to a user and market centric vision of Ubuntu. They will invite a number of contributors from different parts of the KDE project to the next developers meeting in June in Paris, where the next Kubuntu release - Edgy Eft - will be sketched.

Split up Sessions

After the more general part of the discussion, the group split up to discuss issues such as human computer interaction, artwork, marketing and naturally technological issues.

Collaborations in the improvement of the technical side of things cover topics such as communication on developer level, for example discussing distribution-specific problems directly between the Kubuntu developers and packagers, but also very specific issues such as extending the Ubuntu laptop testing and any other future derivatives to ensure a high quality level of future releases of Kubuntu.

From the human computer interaction point of view, improvements in the acceptance of usability and accessibility are important to be made in the future. Creating more mindshare among artists is another challenge for the future. KDE needs more artists and must help them enter the Free Software community. Kubuntu and KDE will collaborate in trying to attract more non-coding contributors to the projects, not only for work on the human-computer interaction, but also on promotion and marketing.

There are also quite a lot of technological issues that can be solved by having more KDE people in the middle of the Ubuntu community, currently most of the Ubuntu platform developers are mostly using GNOME when developing the underlying operating system basis. In order to achieve that improved interoperation between the different desktop environments on the Ubuntu platform, Canonical will make sure that some of the people Canonical will hire in the future for working on (K)Ubuntu come from the KDE world.



<  |  >

 

  Related Links
 ·   Articles on KDE in Linux Distributions
 ·   Also by Sebastian Kügler
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Over 40 comments listed. Printing out index only.
Vague
by cw on Monday 08/May/2006, @09:01
A bit vague, as a matter of fact. Either things are missing from the news, or they didn't happen.
[ Reply To This | View ]
Is Kubuntu actually feasible?
by cw on Monday 08/May/2006, @09:54
I wonder whether and how the Kubuntu idea can actually work out. Just take this issue for example:

- the next Kubuntu release comes out, ships (let's assume) amaroK 1.4
- since Ubuntu's sound is based on Gstreamer, Kubuntu defaults amaroK to the Gstreamer engine
- which is the Gstreamer 0.10 engine, the only one left (old gstreamer engine discontinued)
- however the Gstreamer 0.10 engine is very young and very immature, lots of features missing, leaks, crashes etc. etc.

- ergo bad amaroK implementation, unless one switches engine to xine or perhaps helix.

And since people are not expected to know/care/find out about this engines mess, Kubuntu users disappointed by amaroK and go back to xmms/something else.

What I mean to illustrate by this is example is the following problem:

how does Kubuntu plan to ship a good KDE on top of an OS which is developed in more or less full indifference to KDE's needs?

Now I don't mean to speak evil of Ubuntu :-), but it's obvious that it's built with Gnome in mind, and that Kubuntu is just constantly trying to catch up.
Why not focus on an OS built either with a focus on KDE, or at least dedicated to all desktops' needs?

What is Ubuntu's stance on desktop neutrality? How is this meant to be implemented, and is it meant to be? I was curious to hear about this, but it seems that nothing is really news on this topic.
[ Reply To This | View ]
The KDE and LinuxTag colors practically the same
by Inge Wallin on Monday 08/May/2006, @10:42
Heh, it's funny to look at the picture with Marks Shuttleworth above and see that the KDE gear on his chest have almost exactly the same colors as the LinuxTag logo at the table. Is this a coincidence? :-)
[ Reply To This | View ]
Encourage KDE developers to join Kubuntu!
by ac on Monday 08/May/2006, @11:14
****Canonical will make sure that some of the people Canonical will hire in the future for working on (K)Ubuntu come from the KDE world.****

This is wonderful news! Let's make sure all KDE developers know about this job opportunity!
[ Reply To This | View ]
Video of Mark's keynote?
by David on Monday 08/May/2006, @14:06
Hi,

does anyone have a recording of Mark Shuttleworth's Keynote at the LinuxTag in Wiesbaden?

David
[ Reply To This | View ]
I can see the problem
by OKnewbie on Monday 08/May/2006, @14:21
I have used *buntu for about a year. I want to use only KDE, however, documentation is lacking greatly everywhere. I use *buntu because of the community, I can find the answer I need very easily. This is not true with Kubuntu or anything KDE I have seen. When it came to setting up my wifi in the Ubuntu it took 2 minutes the first time with a good howto. Until dapper I had not been able to get it configure properly, in the end it was just a need to better know how KDE works as far as configuration. So in short the way I see it is if you want Kubuntu to be first class you need the community involvement of a first class distro and you don't have that. If the community and documentation is their the users will come, especially if you this can happen before the release of KDE 4. I think that then the stage would be set for widespread adoption.
[ Reply To This | View ]
Try Archlinux
by ht on Tuesday 09/May/2006, @03:23
As mentioned before, if you want a distribution that gives that best kde performance and always the latest kde version, try archlinux.

Did anybody notice that kde 3.5.3 will ship shortly after dapper ships? If kubuntu users want kde 3.5.3, they will have to use unofficial packages or semi-official but unsupported ones.
On the otherhand, archlinux will always have the latest kde in the main repository.

Still, if you don't 'need' the latest kde, suse first and next kubuntu will give the most polished kde installations.
[ Reply To This | View ]
Zelotism
by Andy on Tuesday 09/May/2006, @04:33
what speaks against this KDE committment is the announcement of the edubuntu developer which followed his talks that the edubuntu would want to remove all educational apps from edubuntu which are KDE based and replace them by gtk ones. And: He would like to get a K-edubuntu with KDE. What madness, what toolkit zelotism.

I think we should get away from toolkit centric thinking.

It is not motif etc. anymore. GTK and QT applications are quite interoperable and *more could be done*. We should get away from the Gnome = GTK, KDE = QT formula.

Portland offers great ways of improvement. Then GTK often only means that applications uses toolkits which just render with GTK. X-theming, standardisation on the backend level and of course a common unix bookmark repository which could be used by firefox, Konqueror, Galeon etc.

KDE users want GTK apps and want them to integrate better into their desktop environment of choice, same applies for KDE or QT apps under Gnome.
[ Reply To This | View ]
common bookmarks and bug reporting
by Brian on Tuesday 09/May/2006, @06:25
I agree about the common bookmarks used for all browsers. Opera, Konquerer, Firefox, Galeon, Links, Lynx, they should all save a user's bookmarks in /home/username/bookmarks or /home/username/settings/bookmarks or /home/username/browser/bookmarks. Or someplace that all browsers can get to. This should be a part of the LSB.

For Ubuntu and Kubuntu, there should be a desktop icon when running the liveCD, or the installed version, for test versions for making bug reports. The link needs to bring up a webpage or a window for creating a simple email bug report and if email, then tied to an ubuntu smtp server. Lock it to a single send address to prevent outbound spamming. Also have this icon launch a script to grab dmesg or whatever other logs are commonly collected or asked for. I've tested many LiveCDs and several Dapper testing CDs. I've had various problems, mostly with install and i386 and had no idea how or where to send a bug report while running it. I just hunted around and found a blurb:

Your comments, bug reports, patches and suggestions will help turn
this Beta into the best release of Ubuntu ever. Please report
bugs through the Launchpad bug tracker:

http://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+bugs

If you have a question, or if you think you may have found a bug but
aren't sure, first try asking on the #ubuntu IRC channel on FreeNode,
on the Ubuntu Users mailing list, or on the Ubuntu forums:

http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
http://www.ubuntuforums.org/ "

But that was not obvious from the kubuntu.org page and not found by chasing the "bugs" link. The "bugs" link, takes you to https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+bugs and a whole rigamarol to report a bug or crash.

Just my opinion.
[ Reply To This | View ]
Complaining.
by gardion on Tuesday 09/May/2006, @08:45
I see a lot of complaints about KDE/Kubuntu so I will try and show the direction I think Mark is taking based on past actions and news articles rather then just feelings of skepticism.

1. Ubuntu started as a gnome distribution. (Probably for its predictable release cycles of every 6 months)


2. Some people wanted a kde based ubuntu distribution. One of the cheif people being Jonathan Riddell

See this link for an interview with Jonathan Ridell
(http://behindubuntu.org/interviews/JonathanRiddell/)

3. Mark Hired Jonathan to start working on Kubuntu. At that time Kubuntu was not supported with Shippit.

4. At some point Mark Shuttleworth announced that Kubuntu would be a first class distribution along with Kubuntu. Some time after Kubuntu was supported with shippit (xubuntu is not yet as far as I know). This is a significant since shippit doesn't cost us anything but it costs Mark Shuttleworht a lot. Mark I guess was impressed enough with Kubuntu to start shipping it with Shippit.

5. Some people complained on the http://www.kubuntu.de/ that Mark Shuttle worth was not giving access to some of the programmers, wanted more control and wanted ubuntu to hire more kde developers and some other general complaints. They also wanted to know what first class distribution meant. (I can't find the orgiginal article)

6. Mark sent out this announcment about the meeting at linuxtag for kubuntu and kde
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2006-April/000071.html
Basically if there is interest in the KDE community to work with Kubuntu Mark is ready to give a lot more control to KDE /Kubuntu developers even to the point of eventually letting Kubuntu have it's own release cycle (if there's enough support for it). (see the story)

7. We have the this recent announcment where Mark met with KDE and Kubuntu developers about where things can go. It seems there is some interest in the KDE community to work with Kubuntu.

A lot has been accomplished and there is a lot more to go before Kubuntu can be a real "first class" distribution but this depends not only on Mark Shuttleworth but on the KDE community as well.

Basically it seems to me that Mark is doing more and more for KDE starting from nothing when Ubuntu was first realeased. Mark seems to start small and adding support for stuff rather than starting big and taking away like Redhat did and SUSE did with KDE.

Some people in the KDE community want more support for KDE/Kubuntu. Mark seems to be doing that. The question is whether the KDE community will support those efforts or whether Mark Shuttleworth is wasting his time. It seems there are enough people interested in Kubuntu/KDE that it's probably not a wast of time.

PS. I use Ubuntu and now prefer GNOME. Before Ubuntu I actually liked KDE better. Maybe Kubuntu can make people give KDE another try.
[ Reply To This | View ]
Owes?
by Me on Tuesday 09/May/2006, @11:59
This "community" acts like Mark owes you something just for existing. The guy doesn't have to even recognize your existence if he doens't want - his his distro/his dollars.
[ Reply To This | View ]
Kubuntu's biggest problem: Bugs
by Simon Rönnqvist on Tuesday 09/May/2006, @14:30
Hi!

I've been wanting to use Kubuntu for about a year now, but the apps keep crashing on me... and I can't really find any pattern. This goes for both Hoary and Breezy, no matter which of the three available platforms I've used.

At last I gave up and went with Ubuntu (GNOME) modifying it's panel to look like KDE's, but that doesn't give me everything that I was looking for. :-)

Now however I've started testing SimplyMEPIS (which now is moving over to a Ubuntu-base), despite it's ugly default theme (which I changed) it looks very promising. I also don't seem to be alone switching from Kubuntu to SimplyMEPIS, because of the bugs (according to forums&mailinglists). I actually would like Kubuntu better... but the bugs are really a big problem... Why doesn't people involved with the project talk more about?

(Check how Kubuntu has been going down at distowatch.com lately, I think this might be the answer... people give up on it because of the bugs.)

Well anyways, it's nice to see that Mark is showing interest for KDE while others (such as SUSE&Redhat) go in the other direction. I think his, along with the community's efforts (mentioned in the article) will help clearing out the bugs in the long run. Hope SimplyMEPIS's move to a Ubuntu-base helps in some way too.

cheers, Simon
[ Reply To This | View ]
yast
by Hup on Wednesday 10/May/2006, @07:17
Would be nice to get Ubuntu's support for YaSt for Debian. Yast could lead to simplification and unification.
[ Reply To This | View ]
Well..
by Mark on Thursday 11/May/2006, @09:57
I've tried Both versions (K)Ubuntu etc...

I've found the gnome version to be far more stable & easier to use (hardly any app crashes).. on the other side KDE seems much nicer (easier on the eyes, yet you can change the look ^^).. I prefer KDE simply because of the way it's set out... But I miss the stable gnome desktop.. (that's what I think)

on KDE there is also some major bugs in the GUI when setting up Wireless access, I had to edit the network file to get a connection to my wireless router!

praise network-admin in gnome!

(btw I'm very new to linux...)

Keep it coming!
[ Reply To This | View ]
Gnubuntu?
by stairwayoflight on Thursday 11/May/2006, @17:43
I guess the titles Kubuntu, Xubuntu, etc. really declare the obvious: that they are a derivative project.

Ubuntu's philosophy seems to be ease of use, and the question here one of choices. This is quite a cliche argument among linux users, but there is a reason it is addressed again and again. Every choice provided by distro architects is another choice that must be made, and another factor of complexity introduced to the system.

Maybe my question reflects a puritan idealism which if carried to its logical end would result in a more Gentoo-like distro, WHICH IS NOT MY INTENTION,

but if ubuntu is going to be developed with KDE as much in mind as GNOME, shouldn't the gnome version be renamed GNubuntu?
[ Reply To This | View ]

 
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "Default settings are easy to manage." -- Aaron Seigo
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]