Re: Is Kubuntu actually feasible?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Is Kubuntu actually feasible?
by wiesen on Tuesday 09/May/2006, @01:09

I can understand your scepticism and partly share your view - KDE really deserves a distribution that is build completely around KDE.

A better example is the CUPS trouble that plagued dapper during development. The problem is not that I would expect everything to work flawlessly in an unrealeased distribution, but the mere fact that an (at that time) incompatible unreleased CVS version of CUPS was introduced in Ubuntu because it goes well with GNOME and their tools - it improves the functionality. Unfortunaltey it breaks KDE functionality - a known issue, that under normal circumstances would have to be fixed within KDE before the next stable release of CUPS anyway. The matter is that Ubuntu's choice of CVS CUPS was based on what's good for Ubuntu/GNOME and not Kubuntu/KDE. So that's where I agree.

On the other hand you really should have a look at Kubuntu if you haven't already. The excitement in my oppinion is simply based on the great mix of usability and features that Kubuntu provides. In my book it really is the best KDE distro there is at this time - no matter if it builds upon a GNOME-centric core or not.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE in Linux Distributions
·   Also by wiesen
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Man, that new web site is pretty nice." -- Miguel de Icaza
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.