Re: Is Kubuntu actually feasible?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Is Kubuntu actually feasible?
by Ian Whiting on Tuesday 09/May/2006, @05:53

Why don't you just use Gentoo, SuSE or Mandrake then. Gentoo will give you complete control over what gets built.

I am sure the Knoppix team currently enjoy the exact opposite of what you are trying to say here.

I just think that this arguement is a little pointless. What I am more concerned about is what the Gnome team are doing to try to share technologies. We often hear about KDE making use of some technology that Gnome has been using but not the other way around.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE in Linux Distributions
·   Also by Ian Whiting
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Is Kubuntu actually feasible?
by Eero Tamminen on Tuesday 09/May/2006, @11:39

Linking C++ libs from C is harder than linking C libs from C++...

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"My keyboard and synthesizers have a nice pile of dust on top of their covers." -- Carsten Pfeiffer
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.