[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: Kommander runtime badly missing
by Eric Laffoon on Monday 31/Jul/2006, @19:29
There's not a lot we can do about where distributions choose to irrationally put the Kommander executor. As I mentioned earlier, it's a 121K binary. You know how modern hard drives can't afford such bloat just to run one of 5 pages of programs listed for Kommander at http://kde-apps.org. Seriously our only hope is to make this an obvious user problem for them. Complain to them! I don't care if the editor is not available outside a development package, even though our goal is to make it easy enough to create dialogs and applications with that any novice can do it. I do think the executor ought to be part of the base KDE packages though.

From our standpoint there is just a lot of work on the core application to get it where we want it to be, even though it's quite usable right now. With a few months development we could have a far more compelling and capable tool which could also be used to create it's own extentions. We believe extending the capabilities and enabling our users to become involved in the development would cause dynamic growth of applications and acceptance. However we also have the issue with distros. They used to install all of a KDE release. I set up a a neighbor with SUSE 10 recently and had to search out and install Quanta to show them my software. There's a lot of web pages out there. Ironically some distros install Quanta without the Kommander runtime which means some dialogs don't work. As a final challange I've explained Kommander to other KDE developers who have surprised me by not seeing why I would want to build such an application. I have dozens of little helpful tools I built in 5-10 minutes each for my day to day work and I've released applications with well under 100 lines of code. I'm not alone in that experience and that's exciting.

Kommander has the ability to produce no-compile lightweight mini applications (MainWindow apps, projects, KStuff integration and installer coming) which currently can do thousands of internal DCOP operations per second, can use any KDE widgets and plugins and can create scripted actions or script like functions via point and click. It can easily extend any KDE application. It does internationalization and enables users to interactively enter the development cycle as well as become developers. In my mind this is the holy grail. Unfortunately part of the biggest hurdle we have is getting user recognition and demand. Getting Kommander's executor in the base KDE libraries and making sure it's installed is helped by user acceptance and demand and more Kommander based applications appearing. It's a catch 22 because we need more people to know about Kommander and it wouldn't hurt to have just a little more sponsorship support, but of course many people have to go out of there way to even check it out.

I really need Kommander users to make some noise. Recognition and user demand are essential for this program to insure it is not another great idea lost in the fringes. Talk to your distro, build a mini app and release it, help us extend it, help sponsor development... We certainly appreciate it all.
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on Applications
 ·   Also by Eric Laffoon
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Kommander runtime badly missing
by cb400 on Monday 31/Jul/2006, @23:54
I recently discovered Kommander - and it's amazing. Great that you're moving it to more base libraries. I think it should also be considered that kmdr-executor should be easy to install on different desktop environments with as little dependencies as possible.

Just 'cuz people use an inferior DE they should still have easy access to run Kommander-scripts.

Btw. off to do a bugzilla-enhancement for element KDE with regards to kmdr-executor placement for (open)SUSE 10.2 right now!

Go Webdev-team!
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: Kommander runtime badly missing
    by Eric Laffoon on Tuesday 01/Aug/2006, @00:28
    > Great that you're moving it to more base libraries.

    We're hoping to. I'll be sure to include it in a news story when and if we've done that. There are a lot of factors, but again if we have a logical case for a vibrant user base, active development and lots of applications floating around I think it makes sense. In the past we just weren't ready. I think the proposition is much more pursuasive now.
    [ Reply To This | View ]

 
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "Ironically, we are working on that right now!" -- Kurt Granroth
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]