faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: amarok
by ben on Monday 25/Sep/2006, @12:30
|
Guess which school I am from :)
Switching operating systems is work. You have to invest a lot of time, for most people time better spent otherwise. This implies that you need a motivation sufficiently big to switch, which shrinks when both OSes have your apps.
I do agree with your last sentence though. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: amarok
by Nicholas Robbins on Monday 25/Sep/2006, @12:46
|
This is always tough to tell, and I think it changes for the person. I know I watched my sister slowly switch to free stuff, and learn the things that were linux only on my computer, and then switch the nth time her Windows box needed to be reformatted and/or crash on her.
On the other side, my step-father is trying to decide whether he can switch, because he's tired of upgrading his home box every few years for minimal benefits, but cannot switch due to his music stuff online. ( And Microsoft gains another monopoly somewhere that hurts every one ) Anyway, in the mean time, he's been trying to switch in the areas he can to open source to make his inevitable move easier.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: amarok
by Johny on Wednesday 23/Jan/2008, @07:02
|
I use both linux and windows.
I like both. I think it's great to be able to have the same set of apps on both.
People complain about IE only sites. The reason is not just the IE has problem, but also that it can restrict people to windows. I think people should be able to choose the operating system they like best, not the one which will give them all the good apps. So make windows, mac, and linux software available on all or at least most platforms. Isn't that what open source is about, using software how you want, not how makers dictate it to you?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|