Re: KDE -- you are the best!

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: KDE -- you are the best!
by AC on Sunday 15/Oct/2006, @17:41

Are your sure?

Read this:
http://www.stepwise.com/Articles/Technical/2001-03-29.01.html

"2. Next, you want to mount the image. However you do not want the system to be notified of the mount, so you must used the -nomount command."

As said earlier, MacOS hides the mounting of the image.

Related Links

·   Articles on Community and Events
·   Also by AC
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: KDE -- you are the best!
by Paul Koshevoy on Sunday 15/Oct/2006, @19:56

You are confusing a .dmg file with a .app bundle. A .dmg file is a disk image (like a .iso), it can contain anything, not necesssarily a .app bundle. You can mount a .dmg image, but the applications that ship with OSX are not installed as .dmg images, but as straight .app bundles.

Paul.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: KDE -- you are the best!
by Corbin on Monday 16/Oct/2006, @07:13

A single image file (the klik image) is generally far easier to move around than a directory with bunches of files in it. With klik you would only have to move a single file around, but with a .app folder there isn't a practical way to distribute it over http or other file transfer protocols without putting it into an image file (say a .dmg). Since the mounting/unmounting of klik images is done automagically by the klik association it really is totally transparent to the user, though hopefully in the future FUSE will remove the need to even edit the fstab file.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: KDE -- you are the best!
by Paul Koshevoy on Sunday 15/Oct/2006, @20:01

Also, OSX does show mounted .dmg files which you can see for yourself using the mount command any time you have double clicked on a .dmg file.

Paul.

[ Reply To This | View ]

klik, .dmg and .app
by AC on Monday 16/Oct/2006, @09:35

Paul,

the difference between .app and .dmg is minimal. Basically, .app ("application directory") is an extracted .dmg (or .dmg is a compressed archive of an .app directory structure).

As such, .app and its subdir structure does not need mounting (in this point you are absolutely right), it just needs to be there. A .dmg needs mounting precisely, because mounting lets it look like it is part of the complete file directory system (instead of a single file, which it is if un-mounted.)

A klik bundle can easily be extracted, and then it simply becomes an .app-lik sub-directory structure, from where you can run the application without mounting.

More info about klik here: http://klik.atekon.de/wiki/index.php/User's_FAQ

A question to the KDE community: what happened to previous promises to integrate a klik-friendly client structure into KDE4's core? Ya know, things like support for automatic integration of klik app images into the K menu (and their removal if a .cmg is deleted), display of app-specific icons that are glue-ed to the klik .cmg file, and more goodies?

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: klik, .dmg and .app
by anon y mouse on Monday 16/Oct/2006, @15:03

In the time honoured fashion of FOSS - what's stopping ya? You want it done - go to it!

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I don't sing in the shower... I play the piano though." -- David Faure
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.