faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: couple of gripes
by Martin Ellis on Saturday 28/Oct/2006, @08:59
|
According to the FHS, /media is for removable media:
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#MEDIAMOUNTPOINT
It doesn't seem particularly explicit wrt. whether it's exclusively for removeable media though. Either way, /mnt is still an acceptable place to mount stuff. It certainly doesn't appear to be deprecated. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: couple of gripes
by terracotta on Saturday 28/Oct/2006, @13:33
|
Nobody said it wasn't acceptable, but /media is acceptable as well and a lot more clear to what it is used for. Not used hard disk partitions are mounted there as well, while in for example media:/ all hard disks (even the one mounted to / ) are shown there (which is irritating to me, but that's a personal opinion). From the beginning of Ubuntu their preference of mounting stuff to /media was quite clear. The only thing they need to work out now, is a way to show the not mounted optical drives or removable media that are in the drive or in the usb-port to show up like in media:/.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: couple of gripes
by mart on Monday 30/Oct/2006, @07:49
|
Oh, I interpreted "Anyway, you are supposed to mount to /media, now" as a statement that things shouldn't be mounted there.
Besides, even if you do mount hard drives to /media, this isn't about mounting hard disks. The thread is about mounting NFS volumes.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|