[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: i maybe missed something
by vm on Saturday 28/Oct/2006, @11:57
that is not true. kubuntu is an oficial ubuntu project. The site you refer to has nothing to do with redhat or fedora. redhat's official position on kde is that right now they are tolerating it because of its demand but we are working to get rid of kde if we can. we are doing our best, in concert with ubuntu and novell, to market the hell outta gnome so it will be possible in the future.
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on KDE in Linux Distributions
 ·   Also by vm
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: i maybe missed something
by Anonymous on Saturday 28/Oct/2006, @17:05
Troll
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: i maybe missed something
    by The Badger on Monday 30/Oct/2006, @05:09
    Whether the commenter is misrepresenting Red Hat's strategic position or not, the technical aspects of Red Hat's KDE packages speak for themselves: bizarre application defaults (yes, let's use some broken GNOME document viewer instead of kpdf), missing applications in the default install (Kontact replaced with Evolution). It surprises me that you don't get Nautilus as the default file manager, although it actually is the default if you open directories in Firefox. And this is their Enterprise Linux, not some Fedora version that you can claim is "unpolished" or whatever other excuse comes to mind.

    Red Hat have been doctoring their KDE packages for a very long time, and the resulting deliverables can't usually be regarded as improvements. I guess that's why the independent KDE package scene is so vibrant, although the dependency chasm between the two sets of packages was so wide when I last ran Red Hat it was quite a scary move to make the switch.
    [ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: i maybe missed something
    by vm on Saturday 04/Nov/2006, @16:57
    Go to http://kde-redhat.sourceforge.net and read the disclaimer.
    [ Reply To This | View ]
    • Re: i maybe missed something
      by vm on Saturday 04/Nov/2006, @17:01
      Do you think that a major linux distro such as redhat, which is making more profits than any other linux company, wouldn't hire their own people to package KDE for their distro ? Does it have to be packaged by independent people eager to see KDE available for fedora/redhat ?

      I live in Raleigh, NC and have been to RH HQ several times - don't call me a troll. I have met many RH developers at Triangle LUG also.
      [ Reply To This | View ]

 
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "If there is smoke, there could be a fire." -- Konqi
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]