[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf
 main
 parent
 thread


Re: KViewShell?
by Corbin on Monday 30/Oct/2006, @05:55
oKular may have a great name, but name alone doesn't determine which application (oKular vs KViewShell) is the better universal viewer.
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on Developer
 ·   Also by Corbin
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: KViewShell?
by Albert Astals Cid on Monday 30/Oct/2006, @08:03
Just for the record, the optimizations they added to kviewshell are in okular code for a year or more already.
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: KViewShell?
    by ac on Monday 30/Oct/2006, @11:24
    relax, albert! You're a great coder. Oklular is a nice program, so is KViewShell.
    [ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: KViewShell?
    by Corbin on Monday 30/Oct/2006, @19:24
    Just for the record, I wasn't commenting on the quality of either of them (except that I like the name).
    [ Reply To This | View ]

 
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
  "When I'm not hacking on a computer, I like to play the guitar and get drunk. Sometimes both at once." -- Richard J. Moore
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]