Re: Mailody

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Mailody
by Hobbes on Monday 30/Oct/2006, @06:07

> Why should the creation of Mailody mean that there is anything wrong with kmail?

It seems obvious to me: they are both mail clients! Whether KMail has nothing wrong and a new mail client is purposeless, whether KMail lacks features and a new client may be useful. Pure logic.

I have read his posts on his blog (thanks Fred). Mailody was started because its author missed features in KMail and he was not able to add them in KMail. It seems that KMail code was hard to understand.

Related Links

·   Articles on Developer
·   Also by Hobbes
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Mailody
by Stephen on Monday 30/Oct/2006, @11:25

> It seems that KMail code was hard to understand.
Sadly I'd agree if that were the case.
I tried to look into fixing something a few days ago. It is horribly unorganized under the top level directory they have 414 files!
I hope for kde4 they plan on cleaning it up a bit.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"World domination doesn't come by itself." -- Ralf Nolden
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.