Re: Pattern

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Pattern
by Gato on Monday 30/Oct/2006, @06:16

> it would be better if there were consensus about the correct path to take

Right, as long as the path is really the correct one. But some paths have subtle flaws that will only be revealed by experience. And sometimes none of the paths is the correct one, because the competing solutions are not really solutions to the same problem, they are solutions to similar problems.

Sometimes the developers are not compatible themselves, and they can't form a single team, so they do the next best thing and form two teams.

It's not really a reason to get alarmed. However if none of the alternatives ends up really good, then you do have a real problem - and then it might be time to sacrifice diversity and emphasize sameness.

What's important is letting things evolve instead of getting dogmatic.

Oh and it's also important to ship just one of the alternatives with stock KDE, and perhaps make it easy for distributions to replace it with their choice. And icecream. And an end to bugs ;-)

Related Links

·   Articles on Developer
·   Also by Gato
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Feature freeze means that everyone has a bad feeling when they change something, almost nothing more." -- Stephan Kulow
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.