[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: Open Babel problems?
by Geoff Hutchison on Thursday 01/Feb/2007, @07:28
If you have particular "problems" with Open Babel, you really should report them to the bug tracker. Please don't just gripe about the project on a random forum -- your bugs won't be fixed that way. Better yet, please give us example files of stripping out annotations and tell us what we should do instead. Residue information certainly should be retained when reading a PDB file. Check out PDB -> Mol2 for example.

Yes, Avogadro does have options for rendering a residue at a time, or secondary structure, etc. We've planned it that way. But Avogadro is also based on Open Babel, so if you really think there are problems in the underlying library, it'll be a problem with Kalzium, Avogadro... well quite a few viewers.

I like to think Open Babel as a project is pretty good about responding to critiques and suggestions. So please tell us what we're doing wrong so we can fix them!

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openbabel
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on KDE Public Relations and Marketing
 ·   Also by Geoff Hutchison
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "My hobbies include, well, coding... and uhm... that's about it." -- Daniel M. Duley
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]