Quickies: Dev Wiki, Sonnet, Jambi, Scientific Analysis and CSS Compliance

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main

Quickies: Dev Wiki, Sonnet, Jambi, Scientific Analysis and CSS Compliance

Posted by Jonathan Riddell on Monday 19/Feb/2007, @14:37
from the 非常快速地 dept.
Vote for the name of the new KDE developer and sysadmin wiki. *** Nathan Sanders reveals that KDE 4's Sonnet will turbocharge language processing at Linux.com. *** Trolltech announced the first beta release of Qt Jambi, now available for testing and feedback. *** ChainLink is a new Qt 4 integrated environment for scientific data analysis and visualisation using Matlab/Octave/Scilab compatible syntax. Version 0.5.3 was released last week and the author is looking for some talented developers. *** CSS3.info blogs that Konqueror is the most compliant browser for CSS. "The latest release of the KHTML rendering engine passes all of the tests in our CSS selector testsuite - making the Konqueror 3.5.6 browser the most CSS3-compatible of all."

< | >

Related Links

·   Articles on Quickies
·   Also by Jonathan Riddell
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Over 40 comments listed. Printing out index only.

I guess we don't need Unity...
by Patcito on Monday 19/Feb/2007, @16:18

...if KHTML support all css-3 features already :)

[ Reply To This | View ]

firefox killer rumour
by Bob on Monday 19/Feb/2007, @16:34

I heard I think it was on the yahoo video that some KHTML developpers are doing a Unity based browser that will run on all platforms and will have the same kind of features as firefox such as extentions and all.

Is this true?

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: firefox killer rumour by Troy Unrau on Monday 19/Feb/2007, @17:10

Re: firefox killer rumour by Bob on Monday 19/Feb/2007, @18:40

Re: firefox killer rumour by Bill on Monday 19/Feb/2007, @21:41

Re: firefox killer rumour by Aaron J. Seigo on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @08:44

Re: firefox killer rumour by Ben on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @09:30

Re: firefox killer rumour by MK on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @14:07

Re: firefox killer rumour by Anonymous Ferret on Wednesday 21/Feb/2007, @00:36

Re: firefox killer rumour by MK on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @14:07

Re: firefox killer rumour by MK on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @14:15

Re: firefox killer rumour by Bill on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @12:04

Re: firefox killer rumour by George Staikos on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @18:24

Re: firefox killer rumour by Bill on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @20:33
Re: firefox killer rumour by MK on Wednesday 21/Feb/2007, @08:51

Re: firefox killer rumour by George Staikos on Wednesday 21/Feb/2007, @10:11

Re: firefox killer rumour by MK on Wednesday 21/Feb/2007, @13:16

Gmail?
by Guga on Monday 19/Feb/2007, @19:28

Does this mean Gmail will now work (in full AJAX mode) in Konqueror? Or is it Gmail's fault that it doesn't work, and not some feature shortage in Konqueror?

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Gmail? by elsewhere on Monday 19/Feb/2007, @20:17

Re: Gmail? by Cyrille Berger on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @00:06

Re: Gmail? by boemer on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @03:16

Re: Gmail? by Allan Sandfeld on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @06:57

Re: Gmail? by Aaron J. Seigo on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @08:48

Re: Gmail? by Ben on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @09:33
Re: Gmail? by LB on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @13:18

Re: Gmail? by Tim on Wednesday 21/Feb/2007, @06:23

Re: Gmail? by JohnFlux on Thursday 22/Feb/2007, @03:04

Re: Gmail? by Iñaki Baz on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @12:54

Re: Gmail? by boemer on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @17:11

Re: Gmail? by Steve on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @06:02

Re: Gmail? by Erik on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @06:54

Re: Gmail? by Tim on Wednesday 21/Feb/2007, @06:25

Developer wiki name
by . on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @02:14

First, please read the explanation: http://developernew.kde.org/Talk:Projects/NamingTheWiki

An excerpt:

"""Garage for me gives connotations of cool, gritty work. I'm all for Garage. Maybe 'KDE Garage' or 'Tech Garage' or whatever, but I like it. It's also a failry unique yet easily rememberable name. I can easily imagine directing people towards "the garage" for tutorials etc."""

I think TechBase and TechNet is named after Microsoft's TechNet or MSDN, so let's avoid such hacky names.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Developer wiki name by Thomas Zander on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @06:06

Re: Developer wiki name by . on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @06:52

Re: Developer wiki name by Chani on Sunday 25/Feb/2007, @14:58

Re: Developer wiki name by . on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @06:56
Re: Developer wiki name by Aaron J. Seigo on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @08:52

Re: Developer wiki name by Slubs on Tuesday 20/Feb/2007, @09:06

Re: Developer wiki name by mrp on Wednesday 21/Feb/2007, @01:47
Re: Developer wiki name by mrp on Wednesday 21/Feb/2007, @01:47

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I always have things in progress." -- Kurt Granroth
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.