faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: default filemanager
by Richard Van Den Boom on Sunday 25/Feb/2007, @00:03
|
>for many it isn't. for many more it is.
And what are you basing this claim on? Any statistics, any poll that proves this?
Or are you just basing this claim on what you think is the good thing, based on some personal experiences?
My personal experiences, for what it's worth, tells that it does not really matter. The whole world statistics, showing that most people use Explorer which is at the same time a web browser and a file manager, seem to prove you wrong, beginners easily use the same app for both tasks.
Well... anyway, I'm probably making too much noise about this, since the willingness seems to make both apps live, I guess there's not much point being worried. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: default filemanager
by illogic-al on Sunday 25/Feb/2007, @07:36
|
Of course we have the statistics, here they are:
66% of the universe agrees, adding dolphin as the default file manager will not cause KDE to implde upon itself.
Happy?
MY FAVORITE line of yours however has got to be this one:
>Or are you just basing this claim on what you think is the good thing, based on some personal experiences?
Much like you and you "wife" mayhaps?
but this one comes pretty close too:
>The whole world statistics, showing that most people use Explorer which is at the same time a web browser and a file manager, seem to prove you wrong, beginners easily use the same app for both tasks.
Ah the whole world statistics. So because users on a different system, who are largely unaware of alternatives choose to actually Live with what they are presented with, it is automatically good.
By your logic we can say that the jews absolutely loved their concentration camps. Good on yah sir. Good on yah.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: default filemanager
by superstoned on Monday 26/Feb/2007, @02:01
|
Come on, guys, let's not fight about this. We're KDE users, and many of us (including me) don't understand why anybody would use Gnome - it's less powerfull, and the so-called usability we don't care about. But many people seem to do, no matter what we thing or what 'statistics' we quote or use. Now KDE is adding an option for those who prefer this 'usability', without crippling the userinterface or removing capabilities in any way. This will help some people use KDE, and won't make a difference to us.
So WHY are we fighting about this?!?!? Please, a big hug, no more flames, and be happy...
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|