faq  flatforty  contribute  subscribe  configure  search  rdf  main  parent  thread	Re: default filemanager by otherAC on Saturday 24/Feb/2007, @15:26 >>why developers think that they know better? In the end, they write the code.. >> whey you dont try to take a poll and ask users about something like this? most users don't take polls. >> Yes!Dolphin (maybe) is a good Simple File Manager. So, what's the problem? >>but whats the matter with Konqueror? it's too technical and has too tight integrated filemanagement webbrowsing features >>maybe Distro's will change their filemanager to dolphin, which says enough about konqueror >> KDE aims to be a powerfull Desktop Enviroment.Changing default file manager to Dolphin is againts this. what's the difference between distro's defaulting to dolphin or kde defaulting to it and distro follow that choise? Both ways dolphin becomes the default filemanager on many systems. powerusers can change that easily to konqueror >> I agree that making Toolbars change ith Profiles is the best solution That's how konqueror works in kde 3.x Apperently, that's not considered the best solution for kde4	Related Links  ·   Articles on KDE Official News  ·   Also by otherAC  ·   Contact author Thread Threshold: 10 comments 20 comments 30 comments 40 comments 50 comments 60 comments 70 comments 80 comments 90 comments 100 comments 110 comments 120 comments 130 comments 140 comments 150 comments 160 comments 170 comments 180 comments 190 comments 200 comments 300 comments 400 comments 500 comments 1000 comments
	The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. ( Reply ) Re: default filemanager by Emil Sedgh on Sunday 25/Feb/2007, @06:36 >> In the end, they write the code.. I know this.i know they write code and they make my life easier.I am a KDE fan, im living with it and i love it.but i dont think every time I want to write a comment, i should repeat these.everybody knows these. >> most users don't take polls. which is better?asking 10-50 developers or asking all of dot people who read dot? >> it's too technical and has too tight integrated filemanagement webbrowsing features I think making Konqueror's code cleaner is easier than making a new file manager.and its really the good piece of Konqueror.its both Filemanager and web-browser. >> what's the difference between distro's defaulting to dolphin or kde defaulting to it and distro >> follow that choise? >> Both ways dolphin becomes the default filemanager on many systems. >> powerusers can change that easily to konqueror KDE should try to use the best applications with its default package.lots of distro's will not touch it. [ Reply To This | View ] Re: default filemanager by otherAC on Sunday 25/Feb/2007, @14:45 >>I know this. But you asked the question :) >>which is better?asking 10-50 developers or asking all of dot people who read dot? I'd say the developers. Average users don't read the dot. Best choice would be to ask a team of experts to determine what's the best choice for kde. Not a bunch of random users.. >>I think making Konqueror's code cleaner is easier than making a new file manager Yep, and that is what i would like to see. But apperently the kde developers choose otherwise. I hope they would change their mind and make konqueror a less cluttered webbrowser/filemanager, but with dolphin in kdebase they chose another path. >>KDE should try to use the best applications with its default package.lots of distro's will not touch it. What's best is not easy to determine. It looks like distro's are looking for a more simplified desktop, so even if konqueror is default and dolphin part of extragear, chances are that kubuntu for example chooses dolphin as default.. [ Reply To This | View ] Re: default filemanager by Emil Sedgh on Sunday 25/Feb/2007, @06:41 >> In the end, they write the code.. I know this.i know they write code and they make my life easier.I am a KDE fan, im living with it and i love it.but i dont think every time I want to write a comment, i should repeat these.everybody knows these. >> most users don't take polls. which is better?asking 10-50 developers or asking all of dot people who read dot? >> it's too technical and has too tight integrated filemanagement webbrowsing features I think making Konqueror's code cleaner is easier than making a new file manager.and its really the good piece of Konqueror.its both Filemanager and web-browser. >> what's the difference between distro's defaulting to dolphin or kde defaulting to it and distro >> follow that choise? >> Both ways dolphin becomes the default filemanager on many systems. >> powerusers can change that easily to konqueror KDE should try to use the best applications with its default package.lots of distro's will not touch it. [ Reply To This | View ] The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them. ( Reply )

		"I switch between vi and xemacs quite a lot. I'm happy with both." -- Simon Hausmann
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.

[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]