faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: performance
by Sebastian Sauer on Monday 26/Feb/2007, @07:14
|
Performance and speed is an ongoing topic and while I am not sure if the 4.0.0-release will be actualy faster, there stays a lot of time+potential to get it even significant faster then 3.x was/is during it's lifetime just like 3.x.x improved it's performance during the time.
From someone who runs KDE 3.5.5 on his 500MHz+128MB RAM Compaq Armada and it works fine as long as I don't start OOo (but KOffice is there anyway to replace it ;) |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: performance
by Ben on Monday 26/Feb/2007, @13:21
|
And I thought I was pushing it with 800MHz+378MB ram.
What distro do you guys use? I'm on debian testing.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: performance
by personmandude on Monday 26/Feb/2007, @16:22
|
Slackware all the way brotha
I'm using slackware 10.0 with a big mix of newer software, but I'm thinking of upgrading to 11.0 soon. It's compiled with GCC 3.4 as opposed to GCC 3.3, so it should be a wee bit faster....
Well yeah, at the beginning of the KDE 4 journey there was a lot of hype about how performance was going to be improved, etc...
I'm hoping that it actually wil :) :)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: performance
by superstoned on Tuesday 27/Feb/2007, @03:29
|
Well, in some area's, performance will be improved. I guess memory usage can be lower if you disable certain things like strigi's indexing daemon. In any case, you'll have more features for your memory, as Qt4 binaries use approx 20% less memory compared to the same Qt3 executable. And there are more opportunities to use hardware acceleration in KDE/Qt4, so painting might be faster, even on slower hardware without 3D hardware (even 2D could be used better ;-))
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|