Re: More configurable, maybe?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: More configurable, maybe?
by Evan Robert on Thursday 01/Mar/2007, @18:34

"as Troy mentioned, the "breadcrumbs" mode would not be a good fit for Konqueror as the mode is not useful for webbrowsing"

It would be very easy to implement it so that Konqueror switches to using a breadcrumb interface when in filebrowsing mode. I hope this switch to Dolphin development doesn't mean the filesystem side of Konqueror is left as is. I don't see why anything currently implemented in dolphin couldn't be included in Konqueror's fileview mode.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Public Relations and Marketing
·   Also by Evan Robert
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: More configurable, maybe?
by Boudewijn Rempt on Thursday 01/Mar/2007, @22:48

I'd say that breadcrumbs aren't a good fit for file browsing either. The only place where breadcrumbs (sort of) work are in blogs -- and even there it's only useful because there isn't anything better, really.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: More configurable, maybe?
by Cerulean on Friday 02/Mar/2007, @09:38

Any reason why you don't think they're a good fit for file browsing? The advantages are that you have one click access to to any ancestor directories AND (by holding down the button, moving your mouse a bit, and then releasing) access to direct descendents of directories in the ancestor directories.
I can't see any real disadvantages.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: More configurable, maybe?
by Gabriel Gazzán on Saturday 03/Mar/2007, @07:19

Well, maybe you're not looking for them really.

I see one clear disadvantage, and it is that with the "breadwhatever" you totally lose the sense of where you're standing inside the directory tree. There's no single way in this paradigm to eyeball what other places are there in the directory structure to find what you're looking for (an image, text, whatever).

Let me say that I really dislike that paradigm and from my experience is something that is not by any means more usable than the tree structure, let alone that you're trying to change what 95% people already feel comfortable with as Richard stated.

If I was to ask something to Dolphin's developers as not to make this breadchunks the default way of looking at the file structure. Make them an option for people wanting to 'think different'. ;)

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: More configurable, maybe?
by infopipe on Saturday 03/Mar/2007, @07:57

> If I was to ask something to Dolphin's developers as not to make this breadchunks
> the default way of looking at the file structure. Make them an option for people
> wanting to 'think different'. ;)

Please, guys. Try dolphin before complaining about it. This is already an option.

And since yesterday dolphin in svn also has a treeview. It's not finished, but it is there. Added within 24h(!!) after all this complaining started.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: More configurable, maybe?
by Gabriel Gazzán on Saturday 03/Mar/2007, @09:41

Fist of all, I can't try Dolphin, because I use Mandriva 2006 and don't have the chance to do it.
But I would like you to read more carefully before replying.

I said what I said, not because I believed there won't be a tree view in Dolphin, but because, as I understand, currently the breadcrumbs seem to be the default option and I clearly don't like that fact.
I hope I have made it clear this time.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: More configurable, maybe?
by Sutoka on Saturday 03/Mar/2007, @11:25

How are breadcrumbs in the location bar worse than text in the location bar? With a single click the breadcrumbs will switch to the standard location bar as well. Also there is a KDE3 version of Dolphin which should work in Mandriva 2006 no problem.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: More configurable, maybe?
by Gabriel Gazzán on Thursday 08/Mar/2007, @18:43

I don't mind having breadcrumbs in the location bar if I can have a tree view at the left side of the Dolphin window, but by all means I don't want to have it as a replacement for the tree view. This would be a step backwards.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: More configurable, maybe?
by Debian User on Friday 02/Mar/2007, @10:11

I for one like and use the Up button on websites that are well structured, like the dot.

And allowing websites to provide a tree-structure would be good too. Better than learning navigation over and over.

Kay

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: More configurable, maybe?
by kollum on Friday 02/Mar/2007, @10:42

So do I :)

[ Reply To This | View ]

me, 2oooo...
by eMPe on Sunday 04/Mar/2007, @14:28

..I sec.. third that! Moving up is one useful, the Google Toolbar has it also! But it got kinda broke by not being able anymore to move up from a subdomain. I filed a bug 2 1/2 years ago but it got ignored: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95433
I wished I could code QT so I could fix stuff like this myself... after the exams I'll try...

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"There are some gaps in my recollection of the past, I always assumed that was sleep." -- Rob Kaper
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.