Re: Konqueror

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Konqueror
by ? on Friday 02/Mar/2007, @00:56

> what capabilities are you concerned will be left behind?

directory tree.

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Public Relations and Marketing
·   Also by ?
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Konqueror
by ppenz on Friday 02/Mar/2007, @01:21

It seems that the missing directory tree is one of the most requested features of Dolphin. I'll start implementing a prototype during the next days, so that Dolphin offers a dock for such a tree. It's also planned to integrate Qt4.3'
s ColumnView into Dolphin (see Icefox' blog http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/2701 for details).

Best regards,
Peter

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Konqueror
by infopipe on Friday 02/Mar/2007, @02:21

> It's also planned to integrate Qt4.3's ColumnView into Dolphin (see Icefox' blog
> http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/2701 for details).

Nice. I'm eager to see this in dolphin!

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Konqueror
by superstoned on Friday 02/Mar/2007, @02:32

nice! I must say I did expect you to do this, as it's a pretty basic filemanager feature. And I have all the confidence in you and the other dolphin hackers to expect dolphin to be very cool. I might even use it, though that's not very likely as i often deliberately mix webbrowsing and filemanagement (drag'n'drop a local or ftp or fish file into a html input field like gmail's using split-window for example).

Anyway, I think this will benefit KDE enormously.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Konqueror
by Ben on Friday 02/Mar/2007, @03:19

I suppose some people will love QColumnView, but you really really must include the traditional tree view as well.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Konqueror
by Anon on Friday 02/Mar/2007, @04:58

"It seems that the missing directory tree is one of the most requested features of Dolphin. I'll start implementing a prototype during the next days, so that Dolphin offers a dock for such a tree."

Everybody claiming that the incorporation of Dolphin is a sign of the "GNOME-ificiation" of KDE would do well to read this post. There's no reason - none at all - why Dolphin shouldn't be a very powerful file manager, perhaps surpassing Konqueror itself, which must sometimes make concessions due to its dual-nature and resulting large code-base.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Konqueror
by AS on Wednesday 30/Jan/2008, @17:25

Posting one year later:

The dirtree in Dolphin sucks. No horizontal scrolling (bad when you start to get far down a tree), no way to choose the root of the tree (it changes it for you depending on where you go in the filesystem.. brilliant?), and the root of the tree *isn't even shown*. No copy and paste on the directories shows in the dirtree. It is inferior in every way. *Nautilus*' dirtree is better.

It's clear the dirtree was added just to get those of us who complained about it's absence to shut up, and was promptly left to rot. It was added by people who obviously don't care about it or use things like it (since they initially left it out) and it shows.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Spare time? What's that?" -- Dirk Mueller
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.