The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Comments about oxygen
by jacob on Thursday 08/Mar/2007, @05:18
|
Or a tar baby, though that might be seen as racist I suppose.
A barrel of tar?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
|
Re: Comments about oxygen
by Devon on Thursday 08/Mar/2007, @05:25
|
I don't think an actual picture of tar is a good idea. For those unfamiliar with what a tarball is they would be clueless as to what it means but most people will recognize a box or package as a extracted zip or something similar which is more what they are going for. Obviously this is just my opinion though.
I really love how the icons are coming, keep up the great work.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Comments about oxygen
by Matt on Thursday 08/Mar/2007, @13:59
|
Then how about a box of tar? ;p
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Comments about oxygen
by Nanaky on Thursday 08/Mar/2007, @14:55
|
Indeed, I think it's a bad idea. I am not a native English speaker and before reading this thread I didn't even know that tar was something else than an archive type. Let alone people who don't speak English at all.
As a general rule I think it is good to avoid icons based on a pun on the file type, since it is highly language dependant.
And as a user I usually don't care about what type an archive is when I see one. I think it is better to keep all the archive icons under the same format and for example adding the letters of the extension on it.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|