The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Will KDE 4 eyecandy be fast?
by batonac on Saturday 24/Mar/2007, @14:31
|
A display system that supported only QT would force the KDE community to create KDE programs that provide ALL computing needs. This would be a good thing since it would provide complete unification of the Linux desktop. Think about it.. ALL programs would use the same file save and open dialogs. ALL programs would use the same color scheme/widget style. ALL parts of the display would be powered by the SAME graphics engine which means LESS CONFIGURATION and LESS CONFUSION. KDE taskbars should be able to have true real-time transparencies just through QT 4, but NO, in order to do this, we have to write additional 3d extensions to kwin which will be working IN ADDITION to the new QT Arthur paint engine, instead of being powered by it. Arthur is probably powerful enough to do this, but QT doesn't control X, so it can't be done. I'm really sick and tired of X windows actually. X doesn't have native SVG render support so all SVG used in QT programs have to be rendered and cached before they can be displayed by X. If the graphics system was controlled by QT, as QT would improve, so would the graphics system, new versions of QT wouldn't have to constantly maintain backwards compatibility with an out-of-date graphics system.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Will KDE 4 eyecandy be fast?
by Vide on Sunday 25/Mar/2007, @07:49
|
Go buy a Mac, you really want one of those.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
KDE should be better than Mac OS X
by batonac on Monday 26/Mar/2007, @10:02
|
Ha! You're probably right, I probably should just get a mac, but Mac OS isn't completely opensource. KDE Linux really should be a complete Mac OSX replacement, but currently, it doesn't quite cut it.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|
![[KDE Dot News]](http://www.kde.org/dot/Images/kdedotnews.gif)
