The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: KIO-FUSE accesses KIO slaves in non-KDE apps
by Bill on Wednesday 11/Apr/2007, @19:47
|
> I already today can use OpenOffice to open files via IO-Slaves.
> It just takes a temporary file, created behind my back. And
> why not monitor that file for changes and push these backto
> the IO-Slave where it came from?
Because when OpenOffice crashes or misbehaves it leaves your /tmp directory with Gigs of orphaned temporary files.
It's a pain to make OpenOffice and other non-KDE applications aware of IO slaves, and it's outright impossible to do so in closed-source apps. With FUSE, they don't have to be recompiled or modified at all - they see remote files as a normal local files. So it's great for backward compatibility.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: KIO-FUSE accesses KIO slaves in non-KDE apps
by superstoned on Thursday 12/Apr/2007, @03:18
|
this already works in KIO, it CAN create a temporary file, monitors it for changes, and uploads the changed file back to the original location. I agree FUSE is cool, but not the cross-platform solution we need.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: KIO-FUSE accesses KIO slaves in non-KDE apps
by ben on Thursday 12/Apr/2007, @09:13
|
Using FUSE to create a temporary mountpoint is a lot cleaner than creating temporary files and transmitting the changes back. Especially if you're working on a very big file.
But FUSE isn't on all of KDE's platforms. I think the best solution would be to have FUSE where you can, and temporary files when its not an option.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: KIO-FUSE accesses KIO slaves in non-KDE apps
by Bill on Thursday 12/Apr/2007, @11:10
|
> I think the best solution would be to have FUSE where you can,
> and temporary files when its not an option.
Exactly!!!!
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|