Re: IRC channel?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: IRC channel?
by Manuel on Friday 11/May/2007, @03:37

Hey
thank you, though this is not the best solution it works.
But still, wouldn't it make sense to have a feed behave like it should? Or am i missing the point what a feed should behave like !?

Cheers
Manuel

Related Links

·   Articles on Usability
·   Also by Manuel
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: IRC channel?
by Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen on Friday 11/May/2007, @04:55

The problem you have is with the word "should", you see ;) There are good reasons why some places decide only to send out title, date/time and url for their entries in feeds - in this case it's because the community is as important as it is... You don't get comments with the feed, however it's made, and this way you do :) One thing that would be interesting, though, would be if Akregator recognised this and acted accordingly - that is, if there is no content field in the feed, the default could be to load the website rather than just show an empty field :)

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"The trick is not to dream of adding a feature, but simply to do it." -- Stefan Westerfeld
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.