Re: Aquamarine + beryl

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Aquamarine + beryl
by dude on Sunday 03/Jun/2007, @09:26

Your arguments are convincing me, Aaron.

I'm glad to see this feature additions now happening in KDE's own window manager. That's for sure the most logical thing to happen.

But imagine for a moment that something "bad" had happened to Lubos in the last 6 months (the infamous "bus case"... or that he got fed up with KDE4 coding... or $whatever): who would then have taken over kwin maintainership (*and* kept his sanity)??

And would Lubos have felt so much incentive and/or inspiration to defend his kwin territory's supremacy if there would not have been the challengers of compiz+beryl?? :-)

So, to me, it looks like it was not bad at all to have seen that crazyness of the "competing" window managers' speedy feature additions happening in the last year or so (and see them being able to work with KDE3 just fine), and experience a serious "migration" of the more playful and adventurous-minded section in our user base over to the camp the competition (using a non-KDE window manager to run their KDE desktops).

Beryl+compiz certainly didn't hinder kwin's development, and provided a lot of examples (to follow as well as to avoid). So hats off to them!

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Public Relations and Marketing
·   Also by dude
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I guess my process varies from time to time." -- George Staikos
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.