Re: Aquamarine + beryl

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Aquamarine + beryl
by Troy Unrau on Monday 04/Jun/2007, @08:07

Interesting that his quote is such that he 'intends' to develop a compatibility layer, not that one exists. *sigh*

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Public Relations and Marketing
·   Also by Troy Unrau
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Aquamarine + beryl
by Kami. on Monday 04/Jun/2007, @09:23

That's the way of rumors. On the other side is kde4 a large series of promises, much broken, more realized. So, until it's finished or another message regarding this appears, the people believe in the promise. No one knows what is coming, until it's finished.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"We could write better than CORBA. Hic. In a day!" -- Preston Brown, Matthias Ettrich
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.