faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: ATI / fglrx?
by Leo S on Wednesday 30/May/2007, @12:55
|
| I share your pain, I have the same card, and it is absolutely atrocious. In the beginning it didn't even work in 2D mode. At least that works now, but the performance is dreadful, and fglrx is such an awful driver that I don't even want to try it anymore. I spent weeks on it in the past with more or less garbage results. My only hope now are the ATI open source drivers (if they actually release them). |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: ATI / fglrx?
by Jack Ripoff on Wednesday 30/May/2007, @20:49
|
Opensource or not, their drivers will remain buggy.
Our real hope would be pressuring them to release their docs so we can code our own decent drivers.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: ATI / fglrx?
by ac on Thursday 31/May/2007, @05:23
|
so now specs are better then code? the opensource driver community could easier write a new driver from scratch than fixing atis maybe-very-soon-opensource-driver?
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: ATI / fglrx?
by Jack Ripoff on Thursday 31/May/2007, @05:58
|
"so now specs are better then code?"
As far as device drivers are concerned, it always has been.
"the opensource driver community could easier write a new driver from scratch than fixing atis maybe-very-soon-opensource-driver?"
Probably. That driver's just so buggy, it's code may be a complete spaghetti mess. I could be wrong about this thou, perhaps it may just be a matter of cleaning the code up.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|