The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: KHTML as a Qt Widget!
by paul on Monday 02/Jul/2007, @18:32
|
> My WebKit is 3MB
in its bz2-compressed archive? Yes, whatever.
you know, you can spin it all the way, cripple your build into uselessness and remove every feature there exist a switch for, that won't change the simple and unavoidable fact that a great deal of WebKit is about reimplementing Qt.
Oh wait, you did not denied that anyway.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: KHTML as a Qt Widget!
by illissius on Wednesday 04/Jul/2007, @02:46
|
WebKit: 15MB
Average hard drive: 100000MB
I think we'll cope. The other risks and rewards of WebKit are of a much higher order of significance than a mere 15MB. And much of this code reimplementing Qt which you take exception with is a requirement for WebKit's wide portability -- how else could Apple use it in their Cocoa-based Safari browser, and at the same time, KDE in their Qt-based applications? There are GTK implementations, as well. This portability has a very concrete and significant benefit: web developers are far more likely to test and optimise their code for rendering engines with higher marketshares.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|