Re: Oh My God

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Oh My God
by Aaron J. Seigo on Friday 03/Aug/2007, @03:21

i like your definitions. please, release your software using those guidelines and i'm sure you'll feel very satisfied.

our definitions are slightly different (well, not for RC ...). we do want people, particularly developers, testing things with the beta, particularly the libraries. your definitions are made for a different of software development model from another time. kde is a huge and dynamic project developed in an open, cooperative model. this change in development model (which you probably have noticed) results in needed changes in the traditional release models.

wait, wasn't that one of the most basic tenets of open source in the first place?

so yeah, please chill out, relax and think about why it was released. and no, it wasn't so we could listen to whinging. ;)

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Official News
·   Also by Aaron J. Seigo
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Oh My God
by nae on Saturday 04/Aug/2007, @16:07

Yes that's a different definition. Now that I know, as end-user, I'll never
try to test and bugreport KDE betas anymore and I'll always wait to..
(gamma ?) RC as you teach me.

Sorry for whinging, now that I know I'll never waste mine and your time anymore, and I'll warn other end-user too that kde betas are not for
bugreports of users but only for bugreports of developers.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Oh My God
by Larpon on Monday 06/Aug/2007, @19:38

You should be sorry for whinging...
Infact you should stop it completely.

Which part of "we do want people, particularly developers, testing things with the beta, particularly the libraries." didn't you get?

Of course they want other experienced developers to test their code at this stage.
How on earth would you test new a new library as an end user who presumably only know how to operate things though a GUI, when there are no GUI's for libraries (in far the most cases)?
As a developer you'd like -particularly- other developers to test your library by using calls or functions in it.. which makes it hard for end users if they don't know how to write code which uses the library...

The corner stones and most fundamental things like the libraries, has to be _very_ functional before you can even think about building an application, hence GUI, on top which people like you can fiddle around with and deliver your optional bug reports.
Aaron even said they want people to test it and give feedback.

But my guess is that the devs will get more bug reports on crashes in the early GUI, from end users, which aren't the focus point and probably are just there as a placeholder for some other GUI. The more fundamental things like libraries are probably more important at this stage in development as I see it.

Therefore you really need to relax and take a deep breath before crying out about crashes or missing stuff in the graphical user interface (referring to the Great Great Great Grandparent Post here).

...And chill.. no one said they didn't want your end user bug reports? a developer bug report is maybe just a bit more specific on the exact problem at this point?

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"If you have an itch not being scratched, you can scratch it, or pay someone to scratch it for you." -- Eric Laffoon
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.