Re: Maybe wrong priorities ?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: Maybe wrong priorities ?
by Allen on Tuesday 11/Sep/2007, @16:37

Instead of replying to yet-another silly posting I'll simply say:

Thanks kdeedu folks. You are great and you create useful, fun, quality, important, neat, educational (not just for kids)... well, simply wonderful software.

Hugs, Allen

Related Links

·   Articles on Community and Events
·   Also by Allen
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Maybe wrong priorities ?
by Nick L. on Wednesday 12/Sep/2007, @03:08

In what way is what I am saying "silly" ? And what position do you hold to judge it and indirectly characterize me in such a way ? Maybe that of "God" ? :/ I won't recycle my opinion, it's right on the above post. If you want to misunderstand it, please do so. The fact is : basic functional requirements > toys & more, but everything should be well accepted. Peace.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Maybe wrong priorities ?
by Albert Astals Cid on Wednesday 12/Sep/2007, @03:58

Let's analize why your comment is bad and silly.

1 - You say "who cares about KDE-EDU" and then you say "Anyways, cheers to all", saying something rude and then something "nice" does not make people forgot the rudeness.

2 - You assume that KDE-EDU developers could be "magically" reassigned to "more important parts", as you call them. But actually i am almost sure all KDE-EDU developers are non-paid developers, so you can't just reassign them because they work on what they like.

3 - Your rudeness analized in point 1 will probably make non-paid developers of point 2 sad and maybe they'll loose motivation, that would mean less developers on KDE-EDU and no new developers on "mode important parts", congrats you just made us lose developers!

4 - You assume that KDE-EDU developers are some kind of wizard programmers that can just go to "more important parts", read it's non trivial code they have never seen before and fix the code without any problem. That's not true.

So your comment is bad because of 3 and silly because of 4.

Peace.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Maybe wrong priorities ?
by Nick L. on Wednesday 12/Sep/2007, @06:51

1. You are right here, I'm sorry if I offended anyone though I didn't mean to.

2. Here you are wrong. I do not assume anything, you make false assumptions about things I didn't say. I just made what is called an "observation", you obviously interpreted it as a "suggestion" or "trying to boss around". Your mistake then.

3. Wow. I can't express my opinion because when I do KDE loses developers ? Lame way of thinking. Although you are right again I should choose my words more carefully.

4. Again, I do not assume and I do not assign people to projects. Everyone is part of this only because of his free will and anything he does is enough.

So, my initial comment expressed a valid OBSERVATION (note the word) in a rude way, for which I apologize. If you choose to look at the finger and miss the moon help yourself ...

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Maybe wrong priorities ?
by Long H. on Wednesday 12/Sep/2007, @11:03

>So, my initial comment expressed a valid OBSERVATION (note the word) in a rude
>way, for which I apologize. If you choose to look at the finger and miss the moon
>help yourself ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication

An observation with which purpose? Sorry, but IMHO it's worth nothing.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Maybe wrong priorities ?
by Aaron J. Seigo on Wednesday 12/Sep/2007, @06:34

> basic functional requirements

and for some people, these apps approach being a basic functional requirement.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Maybe wrong priorities ?
by Nick L. on Wednesday 12/Sep/2007, @06:56

I disagree. These are not the basic functional requirements of a windowing system. They are extras, just like a word processor or an image manipulation application is extra.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Maybe wrong priorities ?
by Marijn Kruisselbrink on Wednesday 12/Sep/2007, @07:04

Fortunately KDE is not a windowing system, but a desktop environment, and they might very well be basic functional requirements of a desktop environment for some users.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Maybe wrong priorities ?
by Nick L. on Wednesday 12/Sep/2007, @07:36

That's what I actually wanted to say. This board lacks an edit post feature :D Of course KDE is a desktop environment and a variety of applications are supposed to be integrated with it. This doesn't mean it doesn't consist of major and minor components. However, in a distributed development model such as the one deployed by the free software community, putting priorities in every task is a bit hard since developers are not paid workers, but hobbyists. That's why I'm not expecting or demanding things, just pointing out what strikes me as odd :)

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: Maybe wrong priorities ?
by Erik on Thursday 13/Sep/2007, @00:54

> just pointing out what strikes me as odd :)
Doing what you want is far from being odd. Sharing it with others appreciating and using it is very even.

lg
Erik

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"Feature freeze means that everyone has a bad feeling when they change something, almost nothing more." -- Stephan Kulow
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.