[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: Maybe wrong priorities ?
by Aaron J. Seigo on Wednesday 12/Sep/2007, @06:34
> basic functional requirements

and for some people, these apps approach being a basic functional requirement.
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on Community and Events
 ·   Also by Aaron J. Seigo
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Maybe wrong priorities ?
by Nick L. on Wednesday 12/Sep/2007, @06:56
I disagree. These are not the basic functional requirements of a windowing system. They are extras, just like a word processor or an image manipulation application is extra.
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: Maybe wrong priorities ?
    by Marijn Kruisselbrink on Wednesday 12/Sep/2007, @07:04
    Fortunately KDE is not a windowing system, but a desktop environment, and they might very well be basic functional requirements of a desktop environment for some users.
    [ Reply To This | View ]
    • Re: Maybe wrong priorities ?
      by Nick L. on Wednesday 12/Sep/2007, @07:36
      That's what I actually wanted to say. This board lacks an edit post feature :D Of course KDE is a desktop environment and a variety of applications are supposed to be integrated with it. This doesn't mean it doesn't consist of major and minor components. However, in a distributed development model such as the one deployed by the free software community, putting priorities in every task is a bit hard since developers are not paid workers, but hobbyists. That's why I'm not expecting or demanding things, just pointing out what strikes me as odd :)
      [ Reply To This | View ]
      • Re: Maybe wrong priorities ?
        by Erik on Thursday 13/Sep/2007, @00:54
        > just pointing out what strikes me as odd :)
        Doing what you want is far from being odd. Sharing it with others appreciating and using it is very even.


        lg
        Erik
        [ Reply To This | View ]

 
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "I switch between vi and xemacs quite a lot. I'm happy with both." -- Simon Hausmann
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]