The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Why not Kalamity?
by Debian User on Tuesday 20/Nov/2007, @13:56
|
They started recently to always use names with "C", making fun of the old "K" naming habit. Expect more such names now. :-)
Yours,
Kay
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Why not Kalamity?
by doeppjakab on Tuesday 20/Nov/2007, @15:28
|
I guess that should be "Cay" :-)
I'm also very excited, and can't wait to get the stable release. Have any of you installed the RC on Slackware 12 (or Slamd64 12)?
Jim
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
Re: Why not Kalamity?
by Wyatt on Wednesday 21/Nov/2007, @01:08
|
Personally I second this. The rampant K-ing of things has always titillated this editor.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Why not Kalamity?
by Ben on Wednesday 21/Nov/2007, @05:09
|
Its a joke about the constant use of Ks
I think they'll be back to Ks as soon as the betaing is over.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Why not Kalamity?
by Bobby on Wednesday 21/Nov/2007, @07:52
|
Kalamity would be better for the German speaking users (like me) because C tends to stick in the throat :D
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
Re: Why not Kalamity?
by bull on Thursday 22/Nov/2007, @06:40
|
Yes, it is just a RC.These problems will get fixed.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|