The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: Better default font
by logixoul on Wednesday 12/Dec/2007, @00:48
|
Well, I have some gripes with Liberation, as compared with DejaVu.
- at 7pt bad kerning is apparent
- it's designed to be metric-compatible with fonts from the Windows 98 era... which were changed in Windows 2000, and then again in Vista, becoming closer and closer to today's DejaVu (except for the mono variant). So, well, Liberation brings back bad memories ;)
- it has an all-around weirdness, like how the capital R is super wide, or how diagonal strokes are blurry and disproportionally fat... see attached
All of this is with antialiasing on (smoothness), subpixel hinting off (clarity), and hinting style full (sharpness).
I've heard stuff about uncrippling my freetype, but this never worked...
A.png
5KB (5614 bytes)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: Better default font
by nobody a.k.a. idiot on Wednesday 12/Dec/2007, @11:24
|
That's the hinting screwing everything up. (IMHO the Liberation fonts all look awful though, especially the Mono font.. completely unusable)
The solution for better font rendering lies in display technology. Hinting will always destroy the way how the font is actually supposed to look.
I've seen the XO-1 in grayscale mode (200 dpi apparently) and fonts look awesome on that machine.
Right now I run my Desktop at 1600x1200 (@100HZ :-) on a 19" CRT without hinting and it looks alright. I'm having a hard time to find a LCD replacement for this Monitor though. A 20" screen at a resolution of 1920x1200 would be nice but I guess that's not going to happen (soon and at an affordable price).
So the magic words for "good" looking fonts are DPI, PPI, pixel density, dot pitch and so on ..but NOT hinting. :-)
desktop.png
165KB (169574 bytes)
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|