Re: What are the plans for 3.5.x?

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: What are the plans for 3.5.x?
by Aaron J. Seigo on Wednesday 12/Dec/2007, @18:40

> If KDE4 doesn't learn to treat screen real estate with respect

specifics, man, specifics. this tells us exactly nothing ...

> I'll end up back with fluxbox.

the silence you hear is all the people rushing to prevent this from happening. ;)

Related Links

·   Articles on KDE Official News
·   Also by Aaron J. Seigo
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: What are the plans for 3.5.x?
by T. J. Brumfield on Wednesday 12/Dec/2007, @20:17

The default icon sizes all around seem to be larger. The plasma wrench in the corner of the screen is huge. The oxygen kwin decoration and style have excess space pretty much everywhere, though it is much improved as of late. The panel is huge. Kickoff is huge. Many of these items are not resizable.

Will KDE 4 provide a workable desktop? In the strictest sense, at launch, yes it will.

Will it for me? No. I can't stand to see so much wasted space. I like maximizing my work area, and giving the lion's share of my desktop space to content.

I'll check back when there is more flexibility to define the desktop exactly how I want it, which in my opinion, has always been perhaps the greatest strength of KDE as a desktop.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: What are the plans for 3.5.x?
by Aaron J. Seigo on Wednesday 12/Dec/2007, @23:30

it's called "white space", and most people are actually more efficient when it exists.

there's also the issue of higher average screen resolutions. i mean, it's not a 640x480 world anymore.

> The panel is huge.

actually, it's not. it's precisely 2px taller than kicker's default. so why is it so big? the svg that's being used has these gigantic borders. why? because it's the same one we use for the applets because the artists haven't given me anything proper to use yet.

i don't expect you to have known this, but.. yeah.. doesn't make complaining about it any more fun.

> Kickoff is huge.

lol. ok, so.. tell me this:

a) why does this matter when it's something that only appears when you use it?
b) you can have the old, cramped application menu. you don't need to complain about kickoff.
c) the #2 complaint about kickoff right now? it isn't big enough. yeesh.

> Many of these items are not resizable.

apparently many people apparently refuse to read comments to the same story they are replying to. ;)

> The plasma wrench in the corner of the screen is huge.

how big is your screen? it's a quarter circle, diameter 48px. that's not particularly ... huge.

and what is it interfering with, precisely?

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: What are the plans for 3.5.x?
by T. J. Brumfield on Thursday 13/Dec/2007, @20:01

First off let me say, that you have been getting more criticism than praise. So when I say I don't care for something, also let me say, that I do appreciate all work going into the project. I'm just expressing an opinion.

Kickoff isn't resizable at all that I know of. Some applets, such as the new panel, are only resizable by reading the dot and finding which files to edit. At a glance, they appear to not be resizable. When I try a new distro, one of the first things I do is configure the panels in KDE, and I usually go with a smaller panel. The new panel is slightly larger than the old default, but I didn't care for how large the old default was either. I'm not suggesting development should pander to me.

Quite the opposite. When the desktop is finished, and it is easier to customize it to make everyone happy, then I'll switch. A big part of the appeal of KDE to me is the power of flexibility. I like having my desktop exactly how I like it, and neither Gnome, OS X, nor Windows allows me to do that.

Many of the complaints of KDE 4 aren't really faulting the work of KDE 4, but really they just speak volumes of what a great product KDE 3 is. When you do a major refactor, it takes a while to fully match your existing product. I'd be proud that the bar you set for yourself is so high, and it seems like you are close to meeting that bar.

I'm exciting for the future of KDE 4, but I don't want to use it just yet.

[ Reply To This | View ]

Re: What are the plans for 3.5.x?
by Bobby on Thursday 13/Dec/2007, @05:36

Exercise a little patience. Wait until the eggs are laid before you start judging what the chicken will look like. As far as I have read and understood KDE4 will be much more configurable than the present 3.5x so yes it will also be a desktop for you :)

The most of your critics are actually minor issues. you will be able to use a new theme and icon-set if you don't like oxygen, the same applies to window decoration and Kickoff, which you will be able to replace with Lancelot, Raptor or the simple KDE 3.5x menu that so many people are clinging to.
Just wait and see Mr. Brumfield...

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"If you have an itch not being scratched, you can scratch it, or pay someone to scratch it for you." -- Eric Laffoon
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.