faq  flatforty  contribute  subscribe  configure  search  rdf  main  parent  thread	Re: Amarok by Anon on Thursday 27/Dec/2007, @12:02 So how about "Jibbleviewfilm"?	Related Links  ·   Articles on Developer  ·   Also by Anon  ·   Contact author Thread Threshold: 10 comments 20 comments 30 comments 40 comments 50 comments 60 comments 70 comments 80 comments 90 comments 100 comments 110 comments 120 comments 130 comments 140 comments 150 comments 160 comments 170 comments 180 comments 190 comments 200 comments 300 comments 400 comments 500 comments 1000 comments
	The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. ( Reply ) Re: Amarok by Stefan Monov on Friday 28/Dec/2007, @03:49 Or how about fuck you? [ Reply To This | View ] Re: Amarok by Anon on Friday 28/Dec/2007, @04:16 For a video player? No, sorry - I don't see it. Maybe if it were optimised for porn ... ? [ Reply To This | View ] Re: Amarok by anon on Friday 28/Dec/2007, @08:18 KoMedian [ Reply To This | View ]   The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them. ( Reply )

		"KDE is much too well-structured for this world..." -- Rob Buis
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.

[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]