Re: We don't need no stinkin' consistency

faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf

main
parent
thread

Re: We don't need no stinkin' consistency
by Anon on Thursday 03/Jan/2008, @15:18

"You are free to post your ideas on the HIG mailgroup. There you could also see the process there may be instead of assuming there is none."

There have been no posts to that mailing list in well over a *year*:

http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-guidelines&r=1&w=2

kde-usability is hardly a hotbed of discussion and productivity, either. KDE has simply failed, over its 11-year lifespan, to develop a large/ active usability/ HIG-team, which is a huge shame as it has all the technical underpinnings down pat.

Related Links

·   Articles on Developer
·   Also by Anon
·   Contact author

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: We don't need no stinkin' consistency
by mat69 on Friday 04/Jan/2008, @02:51

Well you are right, I had no time to check that myself yesterday -- did not wanted to write such a long answer in the first place -- that is why I wrote "may".

That's a pity. I hope that KDE will have more progress in that area someday.

[ Reply To This | View ]

The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )


		"I ride my bicycle." -- Michael Häckel
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.