[KDE Dot News]
 faq
 flatforty
 contribute
 subscribe
 configure
 search
 rdf

 main
 parent
 thread


Re: Cool
by abc on Saturday 19/Jan/2008, @00:42
Stay serious, Compiz is 20 times more performant than this KDE 4 thing and has 10 times better effects.
  Related Links
 ·   Articles on Developer
 ·   Also by abc
 ·   Contact author

Thread Threshold:

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

Re: Cool
by Lubos Lunak on Saturday 19/Jan/2008, @01:02
20 times, 10 times ... speaking of staying serious, how about you tried to lead the way?
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: Cool
    by abc on Saturday 19/Jan/2008, @01:08
    20 times is the sad reality.
    I don't know why.

    10 times is subjective impression.
    [ Reply To This | View ]
Re: Cool
by Bobby on Saturday 19/Jan/2008, @03:01
And KDE 4 is 30 times better integrated in KDE :) Some of Compiz's effects are also over-kill.
[ Reply To This | View ]
  • Re: Cool
    by Bobby on Saturday 19/Jan/2008, @03:15
    I mean Kwin4 is better integrated in KDE4.
    [ Reply To This | View ]
    • Re: Cool
      by Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen on Saturday 19/Jan/2008, @06:58
      KWin4 is a game *giggles* but yes :)

      (You're looking for KWin Composite ;) )
      [ Reply To This | View ]
      • Re: Cool
        by Anon on Saturday 19/Jan/2008, @07:10
        Not any more - KWin4 the game was renamed to KFourInLine in order to prevent this clash :)

        http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=748209
        [ Reply To This | View ]
      • Re: Cool
        by Bobby on Saturday 19/Jan/2008, @16:45
        It's not a game anymore, it's now called KFourInLine ;)
        [ Reply To This | View ]
Re: Cool
by Segedunum on Saturday 19/Jan/2008, @07:16
"Stay serious, Compiz is 20 times more performant than this KDE 4 thing and has 10 times better effects."

What on Earth do you think Compiz [Fusion] or Beryl were like when they first started? It's also not being developed as part of a desktop project though, but rather as a separate window manager. Additionally, there are also a lot of corner cases and situations where Compiz doesn't work well, which negates its usage as a day-to-day window manager - no matter how it performs or how many effects it has.
[ Reply To This | View ]
Re: Cool
by Odysseus on Saturday 19/Jan/2008, @08:54
And KWin is a 50x better Window Manager than Compiz, which really is its primary function right???
[ Reply To This | View ]
Re: Cool
by Leo S on Saturday 19/Jan/2008, @10:08
I am serious. Kwin performs fine for me (Geforce 7900 something) and the effects are nicer (present windows+filter, switching desktops, show desktops, etc). Compiz (0.6.2) had lots of issues with window placement, and weird bugs like wobbly windows never stopping to wobble. The only thing that I miss from Compiz is a zoom function that can be controlled with the mousewheel (the zoom in Kwin doesn't work for me).
[ Reply To This | View ]
The Fine Print: The previous comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )

  "I switch between vi and xemacs quite a lot. I'm happy with both." -- Simon Hausmann
KDE®, "K Desktop Environment", "KDE Dot News", "got the dot?" and the KDE Logo® are trademarks or registered trademarks of KDE e.V. in the European Union, the United States and other countries. All other trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the poster. The rest: Copyright © 2000-2008 KDE e.V. for The KDE Project. For further information or comments on this site, please contact the Webmaster.
[ home | post article | flat forty | subscribe | search | rdf ]