faq
flatforty
contribute
subscribe
configure
search
rdf
main
parent
thread
|
Re: what ugly mascots
by elsewhere on Saturday 19/Jan/2008, @19:22
|
| If that's the best complaint you can come up with, then I think it's clear the KDE team has done a fantastic job. |
|
|
The Fine Print: The following comments
are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
Re: what ugly mascots
by Richard on Sunday 20/Jan/2008, @01:37
|
wrong a mascot can, if done right pull in clients, get people switching to it. KDE needs a new mascot for 4 (Not logo, I didn't say logo, and I know the difference, but you obviously can't read, and decided to put that in there) There should be a comp to design a new mascot, one that looks better than those ugly things. You want to inspire people to come to it, having those two ugly mascots aren't going to do it. They may bring in the nerds at google, but you want to bring in the regular folk that aint inspiring, actually they are very ugly.
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
Re: what ugly mascots
by Nonymous on Sunday 20/Jan/2008, @04:09
|
What kind of reasoning is that? KDE isn't a junk food restaurant or a theme park! It's a desktop environment and the best one at that. Konqui and Kate are there because we love 'em, not because they are necessary.
Are you from 500 years in the future?*
*) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiocracy
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
|
Re: what ugly mascots
by Nonymous on Sunday 20/Jan/2008, @03:59
|
BEST REPLY OF THE YEAR!!!
<sorry for the caps>
|
[
Reply To This | View ]
|
The Fine Print: The previous
comments are owned by whomever posted them.
( Reply )
|
|